You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The only viable solution appears to be to define a vocabulary that can evolve over time and define Plane.polarization.states as a set of those vocabulary terms.
It is an irony that the FITS polarisation codes were rather dominated by what was done in radio interferometers - and yet there are still missing states - but I think the real conclusion of that thread is that it is rather difficult to come up with a vocabulary that covers the possible cases - I think that this https://listmgr.nrao.edu/pipermail/fitswcs/2008-March/000425.html contains that insight - however it is not an easy problem to solve as no-one has done it yet - it should be solved upstream of CAOM though....
I agree that it should be solved upstream. From the CAOM point of view, I want to refer to an external resource and for technical reasons that is best served by a vocabulary. The IVOA vocab could be the place where the community discussion actually comes together, or it could be more like the UAT where IVOA simply endorses/integrates something from elsewhere.
ObsCore and FITS WCS allow a limited set of states
actual data files often use combinations that better describe the polarization axis (even if degenerate aka 1 pixel)
CAOM-2.4 allows an extended set of values from https://listmgr.nrao.edu/pipermail/fitswcs/2008-March/thread.html
Recent metadata requests include additional things like
Q + iU
...The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: