Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Stack-based Buffer Overflow on protobuf #274

Closed

Conversation

davidesalerno
Copy link

Motivation

Fixes CVE https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-GOLANG-GOOGLEGOLANGORGPROTOBUFENCODINGPROTOJSON-6137908

Modifications

Only g.mod and go.sum with fixed protobuf module

Result

Avoid Buffer Overflow on protobuf module

PR checklist

Checklist items below are applicable for development targeted to both fast and stable branches/tags

  • Unit tests pass locally
  • FVT tests pass locally
  • If the PR adds a new container image or updates the tag of an existing image (not build within cpaas), is the corresponding change made in live-builder and cpaas-midstream to add/update the image tag in the operator CSV? Link the PRs if applicable

Checklist items below are applicable for development targeted to both fast and stable branches/tags

  • Tested modelmesh serving deployment with odh-manifests and ran odh-manifests-e2e tests locally

Signed-off-by: Davide Salerno <dsalerno@redhat.com>
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 24, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: davidesalerno
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign anishasthana for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant