Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8340401: DcmdMBeanPermissionsTest.java and SystemDumpMapTest.java fail with assert(_stack_base != nullptr) failed: Sanity check #22720

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

stooke
Copy link
Contributor

@stooke stooke commented Dec 12, 2024

This PR addresses JDK-8340401 by adding a test for a thread with no stack currently assigned.
PR #21091 was closed unintentionally; this is a continuation of that PR.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Error

 ⚠️ 8340401 is used in problem lists: [test/hotspot/jtreg/ProblemList.txt, test/jdk/ProblemList.txt]

Issue

  • JDK-8340401: DcmdMBeanPermissionsTest.java and SystemDumpMapTest.java fail with assert(_stack_base != nullptr) failed: Sanity check (Bug - P3)(⚠️ The fixVersion in this issue is [24] but the fixVersion in .jcheck/conf is 25, a new backport will be created when this pr is integrated.)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22720/head:pull/22720
$ git checkout pull/22720

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/22720
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/22720/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 22720

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 22720

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22720.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 12, 2024

👋 Welcome back stooke! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 12, 2024

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 12, 2024

@stooke To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command.

Applicable Labels
  • build
  • client
  • compiler
  • core-libs
  • graal
  • hotspot
  • hotspot-compiler
  • hotspot-gc
  • hotspot-jfr
  • hotspot-runtime
  • i18n
  • ide-support
  • javadoc
  • jdk
  • jmx
  • kulla
  • net
  • nio
  • security
  • serviceability
  • shenandoah

@stooke
Copy link
Contributor Author

stooke commented Dec 12, 2024

This is closed as I may be able to reopen the original PR.

@stooke stooke closed this Dec 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant