-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: multipers: Multiparameter Persistence for Machine Learning #6749
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for 🔴 Failed to discover a |
License info: ✅ License found: |
|
@editorialbot invite @RMeli as editor 👋 @RMeli - would you like to take this one on as editor? |
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
There are a few JOSS papers in Topological Data Analysis (TDA)-Machine Learning (ML) in Python, whose authors / previous reviewer could be possible reviewers:
Also, from the list of reviewer having TDA,ML, python as keywords, seem to be good candidates.
I've updated the DOIs I could, but it seems that, e.g., NeurIPS and JMLR do not provide DOIs. Should I do something about it ?
From the logs, the |
@editorialbot generate pdf |
@DavidLapous for the references, it is OK to not have a DOI for references that do not provide them. All good. |
@editorialbot check references |
|
@editorialbot assign @RMeli as editor |
Assigned! @RMeli is now the editor |
Hi @ulupo 👋 Would you be interested in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)? You can find more information about the submission at the top of this Github issue #6749.
Thank you in advance! |
Hi @yossibokor 👋 Would you be interested in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)? You can find more information about the submission at the top of this Github issue #6749.
Thank you in advance! |
Hi @lmcinnes 👋 Would you be interested in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)? You can find more information about the submission at the top of this Github issue #6749.
Thank you in advance! |
Hi @RMeli Sure thing. |
@editorialbot add @yossibokorbleile as reviewer Thank you! |
@yossibokorbleile added to the reviewers list! |
Thank you @RMeli for your consideration! Unfortunately, I won't be able to do a good job due to a convergence of commitments these days. I'll have to decline, sorry! Nice work, though! |
No worries @ulupo, thank you for coming back to me. |
Thanks @RMeli for reaching out. I would like to take this on -- it looks like a great package. Unfortunately I have a lot of commitments right now and would not be able to get to a review in a timely fashion. Sorry! |
I totally understand @lmcinnes, thank you for getting back to me. |
Hi @peekxc 👋 Would you be interested in reviewing this submission for JOSS (Journal of Open Source Software)? You can find more information about the submission at the top of this Github issue #6749.
Thank you in advance! |
@RMeli I would be interested in reviewing this |
@editorialbot add @peekxc as reviewer That's great to hear, thank you! |
@peekxc added to the reviewers list! |
Thank you @yossibokorbleile and @peekxc for agreeing to review for JOSS. I'll soon start the review process, closing this PRE-REVIEW issue and opening a REVIEW issue for the actual review. If it's your first time reviewing for JOSS, please have a look at the following pages: A good way to review is to open issues in the software repository, and link them to the (soon-to-be-open) review issue. Do not hesitate to ping me with any questions you might have. |
@editorialbot start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #6773. |
Submitting author: @DavidLapous (David Loiseaux)
Repository: https://github.com/DavidLapous/multipers
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v2.0.0
Editor: @RMeli
Reviewers: @yossibokorbleile, @peekxc
Managing EiC: Chris Vernon
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @DavidLapous. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@DavidLapous if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: