Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sync to dev #2478

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Sync to dev #2478

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kagol
Copy link
Member

@kagol kagol commented Nov 4, 2024

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated demo descriptions for clarity, including details on input types and functionality.
    • Enhanced layout and styling for input components, improving visual organization.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Corrected label text for better readability in various input components.
  • Refactor
    • Streamlined input types by removing unsupported types, focusing on text, password, and number.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several modifications across various demo components related to input types. Key changes include updates to descriptions in the input.js file, enhancing clarity regarding acceptable input types. Additionally, multiple Vue components have undergone template adjustments, primarily focusing on improving readability and layout by modifying labels and removing unnecessary elements. Significant reductions in the number of input types, particularly the removal of various types like textarea, have also been made, streamlining the components to focus on text, password, and number.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
examples/sites/demos/mobile/app/input/webdoc/input.js Updated Chinese description for demoId type, changing "textarea 和其他 原生 input 的 type 值" to "number 等其他 原生 input 的 type 值".
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/display-only-composition-api.vue Adjusted label text for tiny-input from "display-only&autosize:" to "display-only & autosize:" for improved readability.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/display-only.vue Adjusted label text for tiny-input from "display-only&autosize:" to "display-only & autosize:" for improved readability.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/native-composition-api.vue Modified template structure by adding a new <div> for autocomplete input and removing <br /> tags. Updated CSS to accommodate the new structure and added flexbox layout for alignment.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/native.vue Modified template structure by adding a new <div> for autocomplete input and removing <br /> tags. Updated CSS for consistent styling and added flexbox layout for alignment.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/type-composition-api.vue Removed multiple <tiny-input> components and corresponding reactive references for various input types, retaining only text, password, and number. Updated CSS to remove styles for .tiny-textarea.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/type.spec.ts Removed assertions for various input types in tests, retaining only checks for 'text', 'password', and 'number'.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/type.vue Removed multiple <tiny-input> components and corresponding data properties for various input types, retaining only text, password, and number. Updated CSS to remove styles for .tiny-textarea.
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/webdoc/input.js Updated descriptions for method-addMemory and native demos to clarify functionality and usage of native attributes.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • zzcr

🐰 "In the garden of inputs, we play,
With types that have changed, come what may.
From textarea's reign, we now say,
'Number and text, lead the way!'
A hop and a skip, clarity's here,
In our code, we hold dear!" 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 4, 2024

[e2e-test-warn]
The component to be tested is missing.

The title of the Pull request should look like "fix(vue-renderless): [action-menu, alert] fix xxx bug".

Please make sure you've read our contributing guide

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/type.vue (1)

Line range hint 1-33: Consider adding validation examples for number input.

While the simplified demo is clearer, it would be valuable to show basic validation for the number input type, such as min/max values or step constraints.

Here's a suggested enhancement:

 <template>
   <div class="demo-input">
     <tiny-input v-model="text" placeholder="text"></tiny-input>
     <tiny-input type="password" v-model="password" placeholder="password"></tiny-input>
-    <tiny-input type="number" v-model="number" placeholder="number"></tiny-input>
+    <tiny-input
+      type="number"
+      v-model="number"
+      placeholder="number"
+      :min="0"
+      :max="100"
+      :step="5"
+    ></tiny-input>
   </div>
 </template>
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/native-composition-api.vue (2)

Line range hint 1-21: Improve semantic markup and accessibility.

The template structure could be enhanced for better semantics and accessibility:

  1. Replace <p> tags with <div> for layout containers
  2. Use CSS margins instead of <br /> tags for spacing
  3. Add proper <label> elements with for attributes

Here's a suggested improvement:

 <template>
   <div class="demo-input">
-    <p><span>disabled</span><tiny-input v-model="input" disabled></tiny-input></p>
-    <br />
+    <div class="input-group">
+      <label id="disabled-label" for="disabled-input">disabled</label>
+      <tiny-input id="disabled-input" v-model="input" disabled aria-labelledby="disabled-label"></tiny-input>
+    </div>
     <!-- Apply similar pattern to other inputs -->
   </div>
 </template>

42-53: Consider enhancing style maintainability.

While the flexbox layout is good, consider these improvements:

  1. Use CSS custom properties for consistent spacing
  2. Add margin utilities to replace <br /> tags

Here's a suggested enhancement:

+:root {
+  --input-group-spacing: 1rem;
+  --label-width: 130px;
+  --input-width: 250px;
+}

 .demo-input > p > span,
 .demo-input > div > span {
   display: inline-block;
-  width: 130px;
+  width: var(--label-width);
 }

 .demo-input .tiny-input {
-  width: 250px;
+  width: var(--input-width);
 }

 .demo-input > div {
   display: flex;
   align-items: center;
+  margin-bottom: var(--input-group-spacing);
 }
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/native.vue (2)

Line range hint 1-24: Consider improving the template structure for better maintainability.

The current template structure has some inconsistencies and could be improved:

  1. Use consistent wrapper elements (either all <div> or all <p>)
  2. Replace <br /> tags with CSS margins for spacing
  3. Consider wrapping all inputs in a form element, not just the autocomplete input

Here's a suggested improvement:

 <template>
   <div class="demo-input">
-    <p><span>disabled</span><tiny-input v-model="input" disabled></tiny-input></p>
-    <br />
-    <p><span>readonly</span><tiny-input v-model="input" readonly></tiny-input></p>
-    <br />
+    <form>
+      <div class="input-group">
+        <span>disabled</span>
+        <tiny-input v-model="input" disabled></tiny-input>
+      </div>
+      <div class="input-group">
+        <span>readonly</span>
+        <tiny-input v-model="input" readonly></tiny-input>
+      </div>
     // ... similar pattern for other inputs
+    </form>
   </div>
 </template>

Add corresponding CSS:

.input-group {
  display: flex;
  align-items: center;
  margin-bottom: 1rem;
}

50-61: Style changes look good with room for minor enhancement.

The CSS changes effectively handle the layout with proper use of flexbox and consistent spacing. The scoped styling prevents unintended style leakage.

Consider adding a transition for better user experience:

 .tiny-input {
   width: 250px;
+  transition: all 0.3s ease;
 }
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/webdoc/input.js (2)

230-231: Sync English translation with Chinese description.

The Chinese description provides detailed technical information about the addMemory method and memory-space attribute, but the English description lacks these details.

Consider updating the English description to match:

-'en-US': '<p>Refer to the following example. After the input is complete, the input will be remembered</p>'
+'en-US': '<p>Use the component instance method <code>addMemory</code> to add historical input data. After the input is complete, the input will be remembered. Configure the maximum number of records that can be stored using the <code>memory-space</code> attribute.</p>'

257-263: Sync English translation with Chinese description.

The Chinese description includes a helpful tip section explaining how native attributes work, but this information is missing from the English description.

Consider updating the English description to match:

-'en-US': '<p>You can set native attributes such as <code>name</code> <code>disabled</code> <code>readonly</code> . </p>'
+'en-US': `
+  <p>You can set native attributes such as <code>name</code> <code>disabled</code> <code>readonly</code>.</p>
+  <div class="tip custom-block">
+    <p class="custom-block-title">Tip:</p>
+    <p>Native attributes are passed through to the native <code>input</code> tag, providing functionality equivalent to using native tags.</p>
+  </div>
+`

Also applies to: 265-265

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2e6e2f8 and 5fa671e.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • examples/sites/demos/mobile/app/input/webdoc/input.js (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/display-only-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/display-only.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/native-composition-api.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/native.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/type-composition-api.vue (0 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/type.spec.ts (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/type.vue (1 hunks)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/webdoc/input.js (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/type-composition-api.vue
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/display-only-composition-api.vue
  • examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/display-only.vue
🔇 Additional comments (6)
examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/type.spec.ts (2)

9-9: LGTM! Changes align with input type reduction.

The modification to test only 'text', 'password', and 'number' types is consistent with the broader changes in the codebase where other input types have been removed.


Line range hint 1-11: Verify complete removal of other input types.

Since this test removes assertions for several input types (email, tel, url, etc.), let's verify that these input types have been consistently removed across the codebase.

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/type.vue (2)

20-20: LGTM: Data property alignment with template.

The data property number: '' correctly aligns with the number input type in the template.


Line range hint 1-8: Verify the impact of removed input types on documentation and user guides.

The template has been significantly simplified to showcase only the most common input types (text, password, number). While this makes the demo more focused, we should ensure this change is reflected in all related documentation.

Let's verify the documentation alignment:

✅ Verification successful

Let's verify specifically if any of these documentation files reference the input types in relation to our component:


Let's check the input component's documentation to see if it explicitly documents the supported input types:


Let's try a different approach to check the input documentation:


No documentation update needed for removed input types

Based on the documentation in input.js, the component's type documentation is intentionally generic, stating "The default value is text. The options are text, textarea, and other type values of the native input." This flexible documentation approach means no updates are required despite the demo simplification, as it doesn't explicitly list all supported input types.

The demo in type.vue has been simplified to show the most common use cases (text, password, number), but this doesn't affect the component's capabilities or require documentation changes since:

  1. The documentation remains accurate as it refers to "native input types" generically
  2. Other demos (like native.vue) still showcase additional input types like email
  3. The component still supports all HTML5 input types through its type property
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any documentation or guide files that might reference the removed input types
rg -l "textarea|email|tel|url|hidden|color|date|month|week|datetime-local|time|file|range" --type=md

Length of output: 2238


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for documentation specifically mentioning input types in relation to the Input component
rg -l "input.*?(textarea|email|tel|url|hidden|color|date|month|week|datetime-local|time|file|range)" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/webdoc/
rg "type=\"(textarea|email|tel|url|hidden|color|date|month|week|datetime-local|time|file|range)\"" examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/

Length of output: 6432


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the input component's documentation for type documentation
cat examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/webdoc/input.js | grep -A 5 "type[\"'].*properties"

Length of output: 93


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the content of input documentation to check type property documentation
cat examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/webdoc/input.js

Length of output: 12191

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/native-composition-api.vue (1)

Line range hint 23-30: LGTM! Clean and well-structured script setup.

The script setup follows Vue 3 Composition API best practices with clear variable naming and proper reactive state management.

examples/sites/demos/pc/app/input/native.vue (1)

Line range hint 26-46: LGTM! Script section is well-structured.

The component's script section follows Vue best practices with clear data property definitions and proper component registration.

Comment on lines +40 to 42
'<p>通过对应的 <code>type</code> 属性,可以设置为对应的类型。默认为 text,可选值为 text,number 等其他 原生 input 的 type 值</p>',
'en-US':
'<p>You can set the corresponding type through the corresponding <code>type</code> attribute. The default value is text. The options are text, textarea, and other type values of the native input</p>'
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the input types supported in the codebase:

Documentation mismatch needs to be corrected to reflect actual supported types

The Chinese description correctly lists "text" and "number" as supported input types, while the English description incorrectly mentions "textarea". This should be updated because:

  1. The codebase shows consistent support for:

    • type="text" (default)
    • type="number"
    • type="textarea"
    • Other native HTML input types
  2. The documentation in multiple files (both Chinese and English) consistently refers to these types, with specific features tied to each type:

    • Text-specific features (prepend/append slots only work with type="text")
    • Number-specific features (min/max/step attributes)
    • Textarea-specific features (resize/autosize/rows/cols)

Please update the English description to match the Chinese one by replacing:

'<p>You can set the corresponding type through the corresponding <code>type</code> attribute. The default value is text. The options are text, textarea, and other type values of the native input</p>'

with:

'<p>You can set the corresponding type through the corresponding <code>type</code> attribute. The default value is text. The options are text, number and other type values of the native input</p>'
🔗 Analysis chain

Inconsistency between Chinese and English descriptions.

The Chinese description has been updated to mention "number" as an input type option, but the English description still references "textarea". This creates a documentation mismatch that could confuse users.

Let's verify the supported input types in the codebase:

Please update the English description to match the Chinese one if "textarea" is indeed no longer supported.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the actual input types used in the codebase
# Expected: Find evidence of which input types are actually supported

# Search for input type declarations in Vue files
echo "Searching for input type declarations in Vue files..."
rg -U "type=['\"].*?['\"]" --type vue

# Search for type-related test assertions
echo "Searching for type-related test assertions..."
rg -U "type.*?expect" --type typescript

Length of output: 366


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find input type declarations

# Search for input type patterns in all files
echo "Searching for input type patterns..."
rg -U "type\s*=\s*['\"](?:text|number|textarea)" -g '!{node_modules,dist}/*'

# Search for input-related component files
echo "Searching for input component files..."
fd -t f "input" -E "node_modules" -E "dist"

# Search for type-related documentation or configuration
echo "Searching for type documentation..."
rg -U "type.*?(?:text|number|textarea)" -g '*.{js,vue,md,json}' -g '!{node_modules,dist}/*'

Length of output: 140399

@kagol kagol closed this Nov 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants