Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ 📖 Minor updates to API+GoDoc, Documentation, and removal of a no longer needed label selector #1333

Merged

Conversation

everettraven
Copy link
Contributor

Description

  • Removes the dependentSelector label selector requirement placed as the default label selector for our controller-runtime cache. This was necessary when we used native controller-runtime logic for managing dependent resources, but is no longer necessary now that we have some custom implementations of controller-runtime abstractions that use ServiceAccounts to establish informers and manage dependent resources.
  • Updates the GoDoc of the ClusterExtension.Status.Conditions field to reflect the new set of potential status conditions and reasons
  • Removes no longer used condition reasons from the Go types
  • Updates stale references to ClusterExtension and ClusterCatalog APIs in our documentation

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

@everettraven everettraven requested a review from a team as a code owner October 3, 2024 16:25
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 63e6e73
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/olmv1/deploys/67005513dabae1000871e20f
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1333--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.42%. Comparing base (7d9f296) to head (63e6e73).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1333      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   76.37%   76.42%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          41       41              
  Lines        2438     2431       -7     
==========================================
- Hits         1862     1858       -4     
+ Misses        402      400       -2     
+ Partials      174      173       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 58.45% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
unit 53.72% <75.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 4, 2024
cmd/manager/main.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@joelanford joelanford left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one fairly important question on the cache options.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Oct 4, 2024
joelanford
joelanford previously approved these changes Oct 4, 2024
Copy link
Member

@joelanford joelanford left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me (other than the rebase that needs to happen).

Signed-off-by: everettraven <everettraven@gmail.com>
@joelanford joelanford added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 4, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Oct 4, 2024
@joelanford joelanford added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 4, 2024
Merged via the queue into operator-framework:main with commit 02d2879 Oct 4, 2024
18 of 19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants