Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

📖 Document OLMv1 permission model #1380

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
16 changes: 16 additions & 0 deletions docs/concepts/permission-model.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
#### OLMv1 Permission Model

Here we aim to describe the OLMv1 permission model. OLMv1 does not have permissions to manage the installation and lifecycle of cluster extensions. Rather, it requires that each cluster extension specify a service account that will be used to manage its bundle contents. The cluster extension service account permissions are a superset of the permissions specified for the service account in the operator bundle. It maintains a distinction with the operator bundle service account.

To understand the permission model, lets see the scope of the the service accounts associated with and part of the ClusterExtension deployment:

1) The ClusterExtension CR defines a service account to deploy and manage the ClusterExtension lifecycle and can be derived using the [document](../howto/dervice-service-account.md). It is specified in the ClusterExtension [yaml](../tutorials/install-extension#L71) while deploying a ClusterExtension.
rashmi43 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
2) The purpose of the service account specified in the ClusterExtension spec is to manage the cluster extension lifecycle. Its permissions is the cumulative of permissions required for managing the cluster extension lifecycle and the RBAC for the operator bundle.
rashmi43 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
3) The contents of the operator bundle may contain more service accounts and RBAC. Since the operator bundle contains its own RBAC, it means the ClusterExtension service account requires either:
rashmi43 marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
- the same set of permissions that are defined in the RBAC that it is trying to create.
- bind/escalate verbs for RBAC, see https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/rbac/#privilege-escalation-prevention-and-bootstrapping
4) The OLMv1 operator-controller generates a service account with the required RBAC for the extension controller based on the contents of the ClusterServiceVersion in much the same way that OLMv0 does. In the ArgoCD example, the [controller service account](https://github.com/argoproj-labs/argocd-operator/blob/da6b8a7e68f71920de9545152714b9066990fc4b/deploy/olm-catalog/argocd-operator/0.6.0/argocd-operator.v0.6.0.clusterserviceversion.yaml#L1124) permissions allow the operator to manage and run the controller logic.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm on the fence about how important it is to include bullet (4). It seems that at a conceptual level, but bullet could be left out and the document would stand on its own, such that it describes the concept without delving into implementation specifics.

On the otherhand, concrete examples can be useful to illustrate a concept. Two alternative suggestions:

  1. Re-write this to be more of an example rather than another bullet point.
  2. Going along with (1), is there a place in the docs that we talk about registry+v1 specifics? If so, maybe we insert some details there about how OLMv1 generates service accounts and RBAC? Then we could link there from there.

Maybe we drop bullet (4) for now, and do an example in a follow-up?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

updating 4) to an example


Note: The ClusterExtension permissions are not propogated to the deployment. The ClusterExtension service account and the bundle's service accounts have different purposes and naming conflicts between the two service accounts can lead to failure of ClusterExtension deployment.

The ClusterExtension permissions needs to be manually derived based on the details listed above and specified when deploying a ClsuterExtension.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rather than stating that RBAC needs to be manually derived, I think I would drop this sentence. We already link to the "derive-service-account" doc above. In the future, we'll make this UX better, and I think it will be easier to catch the necessary doc change if we keep the details about deriving a service account in a single place.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

dropping this point