Resilience dependencies for ORAS #73
Closed
sajayantony
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments
-
Sounds a good idea. According to the official .NET doc, new libraries should target |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Closed by #75 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Enabling a good foundation, as this library matures and as we add more resilience capabilities to this like #49, would be critical to the long term usage.
With that in mind and having had some discussions internally with folks like @kichalla and @nathana1, I would like to propose we align with dotnet 8.0 which is LTS and has good alignment with Polly.
The main advantages I see are that we consider things like retries and resiliency from the get-go before we create an auth model. This also enables investing in testing as well.
The downsides, which all choices usually have, are that we have a larger dependency footprint. However, the fact remains that we create a library that can someday be used in serious application and not just for a sample or demo.
Thoughts? @shizhMSFT @Wwwsylvia
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions