Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Intersection theory: correct bug, add more examples #4269

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 5, 2024
Merged

Conversation

wdecker
Copy link
Collaborator

@wdecker wdecker commented Nov 4, 2024

No description provided.

@lgoettgens lgoettgens added the experimental Only changes experimental parts of the code label Nov 4, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 4, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 84.48%. Comparing base (aea00d0) to head (7b085d7).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
experimental/IntersectionTheory/src/Main.jl 50.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4269      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.48%   84.48%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         641      641              
  Lines       85427    85429       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits        72170    72171       +1     
- Misses      13257    13258       +1     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
experimental/IntersectionTheory/src/Main.jl 93.27% <50.00%> (+0.19%) ⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@jankoboehm jankoboehm merged commit 25e774b into master Nov 5, 2024
30 checks passed
@jankoboehm jankoboehm deleted the Wolfram branch November 5, 2024 11:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
experimental Only changes experimental parts of the code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants