-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove email variable #4
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several changes across multiple files in a Terraform configuration. Key modifications include updating repository versions in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
… and variables.tf
…pository, and team
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
outputs.tf (3)
9-12
: Consider enhancing the description with expected values.While the description is clear, it would be more helpful to include examples of possible data classification values (e.g., public, private, confidential) to guide users.
output "data_classification" { - description = "The data classification of the resources" + description = "The data classification of the resources (e.g., public, private, confidential)" value = var.data_classification }
34-37
: Enhance description clarity for repository output.The current description could be more specific about what type of repository this refers to (e.g., source code repository, artifact repository).
output "repository" { - description = "The repository name" + description = "The name of the source code repository where this configuration is maintained" value = var.repository }
39-42
: Clarify team output description.The description could provide more context about what the team represents in your organization's structure.
output "team" { - description = "The team name" + description = "The name of the team responsible for maintaining these resources" value = var.team }README.md (1)
88-89
: Consider enhancing output variable descriptions.While the descriptions are clear, they could be more informative by including:
- The purpose or use case for each output
- Any formatting requirements or constraints
- Examples of typical values
Consider this enhancement:
-| <a name="output_cost_center"></a> [cost\_center](#output\_cost\_center) | The cost center the resources will be billed to | +| <a name="output_cost_center"></a> [cost\_center](#output\_cost\_center) | The cost center identifier (format: x followed by 3-4 digits) used for billing and resource tracking | -| <a name="output_data_classification"></a> [data\_classification](#output\_data\_classification) | The data classification of the resources | +| <a name="output_data_classification"></a> [data\_classification](#output\_data\_classification) | The data classification level (public, internal, or confidential) used for security and compliance | -| <a name="output_repository"></a> [repository](#output\_repository) | The repository name | +| <a name="output_repository"></a> [repository](#output\_repository) | The repository name in lowercase alphanumeric format used for resource identification | -| <a name="output_team"></a> [team](#output\_team) | The team name | +| <a name="output_team"></a> [team](#output\_team) | The team name in lowercase hyphenated format used for resource ownership |Also applies to: 94-95
tests/default.tftest.hcl (1)
Line range hint
383-389
: Remove email variable to align with PR objectiveThe PR's objective is to remove the email variable, but it's still present in the variables block.
Apply this diff to remove the email variable:
variables { cost_center = "mock-cost-center" data_classification = "mock-data-classification" - email = "mock-team@osinfra.io" repository = "mock-repository" team = "mock-team" }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.pre-commit-config.yaml
(2 hunks)README.md
(1 hunks)locals.tf
(0 hunks)outputs.tf
(2 hunks)tests/default.tftest.hcl
(1 hunks)tests/fixtures/default/main.tf
(0 hunks)variables.tf
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- locals.tf
- tests/fixtures/default/main.tf
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .pre-commit-config.yaml
🔇 Additional comments (5)
outputs.tf (2)
4-7
: LGTM! Well-structured output definition.
The output block follows Terraform best practices with clear description and proper variable reference.
Line range hint 4-42
: Verify complete removal of email variable.
Let's ensure there are no remaining references to the removed email variable in the codebase.
variables.tf (1)
Line range hint 1-50
: Email variable removal looks good
The email variable has been completely removed from the variables.tf file as intended by the PR objectives.
README.md (1)
80-80
: LGTM! Clear and consistent input variable description.
The updated description for the repository
input variable is precise and follows the documentation style of other variables.
tests/default.tftest.hcl (1)
387-387
: LGTM: Repository format simplification
The simplified repository format aligns with the updated variable description mentioned in the summary.
Let's verify this change is consistent across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Repository format change is consistent across the codebase
The simplified repository format in tests/default.tftest.hcl
aligns with the variable description in variables.tf
which specifies "repository name containing only lowercase alphanumeric characters or hyphens". All other repository references in the codebase are using variable references (var.repository
) and follow this same pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining owner/repository format patterns
rg -g '*.{tf,hcl}' '"[^"]+/[^"]+".*=.*repository'
Length of output: 51
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find repository assignments in tf/hcl files
rg -g '*.{tf,hcl}' 'repository\s*=' -A 1
# Also search for variable definitions related to repository
rg -g '*.{tf,hcl}' 'variable.*"repository"' -A 3
Length of output: 846
Summary by CodeRabbit
cost_center
,data_classification
,repository
, andteam
to provide enhanced metadata.README.md
to reflect changes in input and output variables, enhancing clarity.email
variable from multiple configuration files to simplify the setup.