Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Alignment across repositories #35

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 30, 2024
Merged

Alignment across repositories #35

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 30, 2024

Conversation

brettcurtis
Copy link
Contributor

@brettcurtis brettcurtis commented Mar 30, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated workflow and dependencies to the latest versions.
  • Documentation
    • Updated provider version and removed obsolete input in documentation.
  • Refactor
    • Simplified label management across various configurations.
    • Removed obsolete variables and standardized label naming conventions.

@brettcurtis brettcurtis self-assigned this Mar 30, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 30, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve updating a workflow version, refining Terraform configurations for a Google Cloud environment, and adjusting labels and variables for better management and compliance. Specifically, the workflow version was incremented, references to user labels were streamlined, and the Google provider version was updated. Additionally, a redundant variable and its usage were removed, and label naming conventions were standardized across the project.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/kitchen.yml Updated workflow version from v0.2.0 to v0.2.1.
regional/main.tf Changed user_labels from local.labels to var.labels.
regional/README.md Updated Google provider version from 5.8.0 to 5.22.0; removed cost_center input.
regional/locals.tf Removed labels declaration and merge operation.
regional/variables.tf Removed cost_center variable declaration.
test/fixtures/default_cloud_sql/main.tf Updated cost_center label to cost-center and reordered labels.

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

infracost bot commented Mar 30, 2024

💰 Infracost report

Monthly cost will not change

Governance checks

🟢 52 passed
50 FinOps policies, 1 Tagging policy, and 1 Guardrail passed.

View report in Infracost Cloud. This comment will be updated when code changes.

@brettcurtis brettcurtis marked this pull request as ready for review March 30, 2024 17:24
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ef540f5 and 4acb792.
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • test/integration/default_cloud_sql/controls/inspec.yml is excluded by !**/*.yml
Files selected for processing (6)
  • .github/workflows/kitchen.yml (1 hunks)
  • regional/README.md (2 hunks)
  • regional/locals.tf (1 hunks)
  • regional/main.tf (1 hunks)
  • regional/variables.tf (1 hunks)
  • test/fixtures/default_cloud_sql/main.tf (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • regional/variables.tf
Additional Context Used
Additional comments not posted (7)
test/fixtures/default_cloud_sql/main.tf (1)

22-25: The changes to the labels block, including the renaming of cost_center to cost-center and the reordering of labels, align well with the PR's objectives of standardizing naming conventions and improving consistency. These changes should not impact functionality but enhance readability and maintainability.

regional/locals.tf (1)

2-7: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

The removal of the labels declaration and its associated merge operation in the locals block simplifies the module's configuration. This change aligns with the PR's objectives of streamlining Terraform configurations and enhancing maintainability.

.github/workflows/kitchen.yml (2)

24-24: Updating the workflow version to v0.2.1 likely introduces minor enhancements or bug fixes. This change aligns with the PR's objective of ensuring up-to-date configurations and workflow optimizations.


23-23: The change in the name field by removing quotes around "Tests" is a minor stylistic adjustment that does not impact the functionality of the workflow. This change maintains consistency and readability.

regional/main.tf (1)

49-49: Changing the source of user_labels from local.labels to var.labels in the google_sql_database_instance resource enhances flexibility and reusability. This change aligns with the PR's objectives of improving variable management and maintainability.

regional/README.md (2)

14-14: Updating the Google provider version to 5.22.0 in the documentation reflects alignment with newer features, fixes, and improvements. This update aligns with the PR's objective of ensuring up-to-date dependency management.


11-17: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [1-1]

The removal of the cost_center input from the documentation indicates a decision to streamline the configuration by eliminating unnecessary or deprecated variables. This change aligns with the PR's objectives of simplifying Terraform configurations and improving maintainability.

@brettcurtis brettcurtis merged commit 04b3bf2 into main Mar 30, 2024
5 checks passed
@brettcurtis brettcurtis deleted the alignment branch March 30, 2024 17:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant