Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Outbound Vuln Disclosure Policy #153

Conversation

JLLeitschuh
Copy link
Contributor

These are proposed changes to clarify the readability and flow of
the OpenSSF Outbound Vulnerability Disclosure Policy.

These changes were proposed as Chainguard was looking to adopt this policy
as it's own Outhbound policy. Chainguard is looking to upstream these changes
back to the OpenSSF.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Leitschuh Jonathan.Leitschuh@gmail.com

JLLeitschuh

This comment was marked as outdated.

@JLLeitschuh JLLeitschuh force-pushed the docs/JLL/update-model-outbound-vuln-disclosure-policy branch from 5dbc998 to 9346b22 Compare November 7, 2024 20:40
Copy link
Member

@ctcpip ctcpip left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

version rev seems superfluous but 🤷

These are proposed changes to clarify the readability and flow of
the OpenSSF Outbound Vulnerability Disclosure Policy.

These changes were proposed as Chainguard was looking to adopt this policy
as it's own Outhbound policy. Chainguard is looking to upstream these changes
back to the OpenSSF.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Leitschuh <Jonathan.Leitschuh@gmail.com>
@JLLeitschuh JLLeitschuh force-pushed the docs/JLL/update-model-outbound-vuln-disclosure-policy branch from 9346b22 to 935e221 Compare November 13, 2024 16:39
Copy link

@eslerm eslerm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@JLLeitschuh
Copy link
Contributor Author

I can't merge this. @SecurityCRob when you get a moment, would be appreciated if this could be merged

Copy link
Contributor

@lehors lehors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can't say that I'm a fan of the cascading layout but LGTM otherwise.

@lehors lehors merged commit 11e4ed9 into ossf:main Nov 13, 2024
2 checks passed
@lehors
Copy link
Contributor

lehors commented Nov 13, 2024

I can't merge this. @SecurityCRob when you get a moment, would be appreciated if this could be merged

Done. :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants