-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 242
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Azure DevOps pipelines running out of memory #4388
Comments
Well...that answers that, the |
Tried using the |
@lukelloydagi Are you using custom self-hosted Azure Runners ? I have many project using Azure, and have not detected similar issues :/ |
@nvuillam, I've reverted to v8.1 and I don't seem to have the issue, I only have the issue with v8.2+ using either default or dotnet flavor. Is there anything in those releases that's likely to be the cause? If not I will have to raise an issue with MS 😭 |
@lukelloydagi just to see if it is dotnet related, please can you try to run it with DOCUMENTATION or CI_LIGHT flavor ? |
@nvuillam, I can do but none of those flavors contain arm-ttk linters so would not lint my codebase. It's odd as it seems to only have the issue with v8.2+ on one of my bigger ARM template repos. |
@nvuillam, if I reduce the linters (by only specifying a list using the Has anything changed between v8.2+ in how the linters are running/consuming memory? |
@lukelloydagi If a linter cli_lint_mode is in By playing with enabling/disabling linters, did you identify the linter(s) that makes your CI job fail ? I don't think we changed anything memory related between 8.2 & 8.3 :/ What changed are the linter versions, that have been upgraded, so maybe one of them has new performance issues or a memory leak :/ |
Is anyone else having issues with Azure DevOps pipelines running out of memory recently?
I'm trying to figure out if it's MegaLinter that's grown or underlying MS infrastructure (which we've seen a lot of lately).
Would reducing CPU usage with
PARALLEL_PROCESS_NUMBER
reduce memory usage too?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: