You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been looking at how we can apply purl to GitOps-style deployments where there isn't a tangible package, rather a reference to a Git repository. I know you can use 'Releases' functionality in GitHub etc, however having a think about it, tags are not actually immutable. This leads me to suggest you must reference the commit SHA only. Would this make sense as a standard in purl parlance?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I've been looking at how we can apply purl to GitOps-style deployments where there isn't a tangible package, rather a reference to a Git repository. I know you can use 'Releases' functionality in GitHub etc, however having a think about it, tags are not actually immutable. This leads me to suggest you must reference the commit SHA only. Would this make sense as a standard in purl parlance?
scheme:type/namespace/name@version?qualifiers#subpath
pkg:github-instance/org-name/repo-name@9242dc5f0c4c2932e61245e4fb0e14592ba130
where
9242dc...
is the full commit SHA.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions