-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Installation intructions unclear #32
Comments
Ah hmm, this made more sense before the nix workflows were added (which don't produce the binaries). You'll want to select the second workflow run ( I want to move away from using Github Actions for releases entirely at some point, it's rather confusing :P |
wouldn't running |
Yes, but that requires having a Go install (unnecessary since I can easily compile binaries in CI) and that the Go install is set up properly (way too many distro packages don't add go-installed binaries to the PATH). I do also want to add a built-in update check mechanism, since people don't tend to regularly check for packwiz updates. |
Hmm, it might not have made sense to transfer this to the website repo, since the packwiz README is what caused the confusion... eh, I'll update both at once. |
Hello. I'm looking forward to trying packwiz. Unfortunately, the installation instructions are unclear -- at least to me. They say:
I don't know what is meant by the "top build" in GitHub Actions.
When I open Actions, this is what I see:
I see a lot of "workflow runs." Do you mean that I should select the top workflow?
On the Actions page, I even searched for the word "build," but it doesn't appear on the page.
I also don't know what is meant by "download the artifact ZIP for your system at the bottom of the page."
Admittedly, I could be missing something obvious, and your installation instructions might make sense to most people, but I'm unsure how to proceed. Is some assistance possible? On the other hand, if you agree that your instructions could be clarified in some way, perhaps someone could revise them. :-)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: