Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: updating tla+ spec #641

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 21, 2023
Merged

docs: updating tla+ spec #641

merged 6 commits into from
Aug 21, 2023

Conversation

b00f
Copy link
Collaborator

@b00f b00f commented Aug 19, 2023

Description

This PR introduces a condition to compare the current cp_round with MaxCPRound in the CPDecide phase. This helps to check the liveness of the protocol using TLC checker.
It has been tested using the TLC checker.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 19, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #641 (1fb44c8) into main (5a08896) will not change coverage.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 1fb44c8 differs from pull request most recent head 66263b9. Consider uploading reports for the commit 66263b9 to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #641   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.67%   83.67%           
=======================================
  Files         155      155           
  Lines        7303     7303           
=======================================
  Hits         6111     6111           
  Misses        914      914           
  Partials      278      278           

@b00f b00f changed the title Tla+ update docs: Tla+ update Aug 20, 2023
@b00f b00f changed the title docs: Tla+ update docs: updating tla+ spec Aug 20, 2023
@kehiy kehiy merged commit 80a6e6d into pactus-project:main Aug 21, 2023
10 checks passed
@b00f b00f deleted the tla+-update branch August 28, 2023 13:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants