Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRDP-287] chore: Add env to customize render check #94

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 15, 2023

Conversation

gioelemella
Copy link
Collaborator

@gioelemella gioelemella commented Dec 15, 2023

List of Changes

  • Added new env CHECK_SIZE_INTERVAL to customize the size check interval
  • Added new env MIN_STABLE_SIZE_ITERATIONS to customize the iteration with stable size

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

Copy link

Comment this PR with update_code to update openapi.json and format the code. Consider to use pre-commit to format the code.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Dec 15, 2023

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Copy link
Contributor

@pasqualespica pasqualespica left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@pasqualespica pasqualespica merged commit eb01475 into main Dec 15, 2023
13 of 16 checks passed
@jacopocarlini jacopocarlini deleted the PRDP-287-add-check-interval-env branch June 22, 2024 09:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants