-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 767
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[xcm] Transact v4 vs v5 compatibility #6585
Comments
Description contains problem on the sending side, when workaround with
cc: @georgepisaltu This is exactly what you reported to me before |
sorry, |
…ns (#6643) Closes: #6585 Removing the `require_weight_at_most` parameter in V5 Transact had only one problem. Converting a message from V5 to V4 to send to chains that didn't upgrade yet. The conversion would not know what weight to give to the Transact, since V4 and below require it. To fix this, I added back the weight in the form of an `Option<Weight>` called `fallback_max_weight`. This can be set to `None` if you don't intend to deal with a chain that hasn't upgraded yet. If you set it to `Some(_)`, the behaviour is the same. The plan is to totally remove this in V6 since there will be a good conversion path from V6 to V5. --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
…ns (#6643) Closes: #6585 Removing the `require_weight_at_most` parameter in V5 Transact had only one problem. Converting a message from V5 to V4 to send to chains that didn't upgrade yet. The conversion would not know what weight to give to the Transact, since V4 and below require it. To fix this, I added back the weight in the form of an `Option<Weight>` called `fallback_max_weight`. This can be set to `None` if you don't intend to deal with a chain that hasn't upgraded yet. If you set it to `Some(_)`, the behaviour is the same. The plan is to totally remove this in V6 since there will be a good conversion path from V6 to V5. --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
…ns (paritytech#6643) Closes: paritytech#6585 Removing the `require_weight_at_most` parameter in V5 Transact had only one problem. Converting a message from V5 to V4 to send to chains that didn't upgrade yet. The conversion would not know what weight to give to the Transact, since V4 and below require it. To fix this, I added back the weight in the form of an `Option<Weight>` called `fallback_max_weight`. This can be set to `None` if you don't intend to deal with a chain that hasn't upgraded yet. If you set it to `Some(_)`, the behaviour is the same. The plan is to totally remove this in V6 since there will be a good conversion path from V6 to V5. --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
…ns (paritytech#6643) Closes: paritytech#6585 Removing the `require_weight_at_most` parameter in V5 Transact had only one problem. Converting a message from V5 to V4 to send to chains that didn't upgrade yet. The conversion would not know what weight to give to the Transact, since V4 and below require it. To fix this, I added back the weight in the form of an `Option<Weight>` called `fallback_max_weight`. This can be set to `None` if you don't intend to deal with a chain that hasn't upgraded yet. If you set it to `Some(_)`, the behaviour is the same. The plan is to totally remove this in V6 since there will be a good conversion path from V6 to V5. --------- Co-authored-by: GitHub Action <action@github.com> Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
E.g. Westend is sending
Transact
to the child: https://polkadot.js.org/apps/?rpc=wss%3A%2F%2Fwestend-rpc.polkadot.io#/explorer/query/0x01cd07a4ede58f34d76422febdf1adc28669c1a2ed5fa5ccaa7d15a7d1bfb0a5take_decoded()?.get_dispatch_info
is a problem forTransact
, because on the sending chain we don't know what isRuntimeCall
so decoding fails here for()
:For the real usage, we use e.g. xcm router which expects
Xcm<()>
:and the
wrap_version
ends here, because it tries to decode withRuntimeCall = ()
"The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: