-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 766
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
migrate pallet-node-authorization to use umbrella crate #7040
Merged
UtkarshBhardwaj007
merged 3 commits into
paritytech:master
from
UtkarshBhardwaj007:migrate-pallet-node-authorization
Jan 7, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ | ||
# Schema: Polkadot SDK PRDoc Schema (prdoc) v1.0.0 | ||
# See doc at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/master/prdoc/schema_user.json | ||
|
||
title: '[pallet-node-authorization] Migrate to using frame umbrella crate' | ||
|
||
doc: | ||
- audience: Runtime Dev | ||
description: This PR migrates the pallet-node-authorization to use the frame umbrella crate. This | ||
is part of the ongoing effort to migrate all pallets to use the frame umbrella crate. | ||
The effort is tracked [here](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/6504). | ||
|
||
crates: | ||
- name: pallet-node-authorization | ||
bump: minor | ||
- name: polkadot-sdk-frame | ||
bump: minor |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The whole issue is marked as
R0-silent
, as well as this PR, so we don't need a PRdoc unless you do something more than just the migration.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To be pedantic, we are only adding new types to
frame
, and adding things is still worthy of PRDoc and minor upgrade based on semver rules.If we have merged some PRs already in this direction without PRDoc, it is okay since this crate is quite fresh, but going forward they should have PRDoc.
pallet-node-authorization
should not be minor afaik, and since nothing is changing, it is a patch.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ggwpez can you please double check I am not wrong?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have been creating prdocs for the 2 PRs I have raised for this issue. My reasoning was that even though the changes in pallets could be argued to be
none
but adding new re-exports in theumbrella
pallet must be aminor
change.I thought about this. I checked the SemVer documnetation and it seems like the recommedation for
patch
is specifically for bug fixes. Any changes to internal private functions could thus be categorised asminor
. Since we are basically just changing imports and internal dependencies, I thoughtminor
to be most accurate here. Curious to hear your thoughts @kianenigma @re-gius @ggwpez .There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Your description sounds more educated than mine, and I trust it more here :) so minor for both sounds good to me.