Skip to content

Adding more use-cases for resolving remote docs

Codecov / codecov/project failed Oct 30, 2023 in 0s

97.75% (-2.01%) compared to 1d566cd

View this Pull Request on Codecov

97.75% (-2.01%) compared to 1d566cd

Details

Codecov Report

Attention: 236 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (1d566cd) 99.75% compared to head (aca3ed6) 97.75%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head aca3ed6 differs from pull request most recent head 0cc6698. Consider uploading reports for the commit 0cc6698 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #187      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.75%   97.75%   -2.01%     
==========================================
  Files         149      154       +5     
  Lines       10822    11624     +802     
==========================================
+ Hits        10796    11363     +567     
- Misses         26      261     +235     
Files Coverage Δ
datamodel/high/base/schema.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)
datamodel/high/v3/document.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)
datamodel/low/base/contact.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)
datamodel/low/base/example.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)
datamodel/low/base/external_doc.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)
datamodel/low/base/info.go 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
datamodel/low/base/license.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)
datamodel/low/base/schema.go 99.48% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
datamodel/low/base/schema_proxy.go 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
datamodel/low/base/security_requirement.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 51 more

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.