Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refact!: move lock_api under barging #16

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 28, 2024
Merged

Conversation

pedromfedricci
Copy link
Owner

Breaking changes:

  • Move root level lock_api module under the barging module. The aliases' inner types have not changed, that is, they are still the barging::Mutex and barging::MutexGuard types. Moving the module under barging reinforces that those aliases refer to a context-free, not FIFO guaranteed MCS lock implementation.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.51%. Comparing base (51ac2c6) to head (1b385e2).

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #16      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   99.02%   99.51%   +0.48%     
==========================================
  Files           5        5              
  Lines         205      205              
==========================================
+ Hits          203      204       +1     
+ Misses          2        1       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pedromfedricci pedromfedricci merged commit 628c974 into main Jul 28, 2024
9 checks passed
@pedromfedricci pedromfedricci deleted the barging_lock_api_mod branch July 28, 2024 05:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants