Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
154 lines (95 loc) · 6.69 KB

mapping.md

File metadata and controls

154 lines (95 loc) · 6.69 KB
Raw

Model Mapping Overview

This document provides a unified mapping of all the models used in the project, detailing their core components and functionalities. The goal is to identify commonalities and differences to streamline the integration and maintenance of these models.

Models Covered

  • SimpleTransformer
  • MambaModel
  • SimpleLSTM
  • LiquidS4

1. SimpleTransformer

Architecture Components:

  • Embedding Layer: Projects input tokens into a higher-dimensional space.
  • Multi-Head Attention Layers: Capture dependencies between tokens using self-attention mechanisms.
  • Feedforward Neural Networks: Apply non-linear transformations to the data.
  • Positional Encoding: Injects sequence order information into the embeddings.
  • Layer Normalization & Residual Connections: Stabilize and improve the training process.

Key Functionalities:

  • Efficiently models long-range dependencies in sequential data.
  • Utilizes parallel processing capabilities inherent to transformer architectures.

2. MambaModel

Architecture Components:

  • Attention Mechanism: Similar to transformers but may incorporate variations in implementation.
  • Recurrent Elements: Integrates recurrence to model sequential dependencies.
  • Feedforward Layers: Processes inputs and hidden states.
  • Normalization Layers: Ensures stable training through techniques like layer normalization.

Key Functionalities:

  • Combines attention with recurrent structures to enhance sequence modeling.
  • Adaptable to various sequence lengths and complexities.

3. SimpleLSTM

Architecture Components:

  • LSTM Cells: Capture sequential dependencies using gates (input, forget, output) to regulate information flow.
  • Recurrent Connections: Maintain hidden states across time steps to preserve temporal information.
  • Linear Output Layer: Maps hidden states to output predictions.

Key Functionalities:

  • Effective at modeling time-series and sequential data with temporal dependencies.
  • Handles vanishing gradient problems better than traditional RNNs due to gated architecture.

4. LiquidS4

Architecture Components:

  • State-Space Models: Models sequences using continuous-time dynamics for capturing complex temporal patterns.
  • Liquid Time-Constant Networks: Adapts over time to provide better temporal representations.
  • Feedforward Layers: Processes inputs and outputs for prediction tasks.

Key Functionalities:

  • Excels in modeling long-term dependencies with continuous-time dynamics.
  • Provides flexible temporal representations through liquid time-constants.

5. Unified Functional Mapping

To facilitate a unified framework, the following functional blocks are identified across all models:

A. Input Embedding/Projection

  • Purpose: Map input data to a higher-dimensional space suitable for processing.
  • Models Implementing: All models utilize some form of input projection or embedding.

B. Sequence Modeling Block

  • Purpose: Capture temporal dependencies within the data.
  • Implementations:
    • SimpleTransformer: Utilizes self-attention layers.
    • MambaModel: Employs a hybrid of attention mechanisms and recurrent units.
    • SimpleLSTM: Uses LSTM cells with gating mechanisms.
    • LiquidS4: Implements state-space representations with liquid time-constants.

C. Feedforward/Processing Layers

  • Purpose: Apply non-linear transformations to the data.
  • Models Implementing: Present in all models, though the depth and structure may vary.

D. Normalization and Regularization

  • Purpose: Stabilize training and improve generalization.
  • Models Implementing: All models incorporate techniques like layer normalization and dropout.

E. Output Layer

  • Purpose: Map the processed data to output classes or predictions.
  • Models Implementing: Final linear or projection layers are present in all models.

6. Unified Mapping Strategy

To align the diverse architectures, the following strategies are proposed:

A. Shared Latent Space

  • Objective: Encourage models to represent inputs within a common latent space despite architectural differences.
  • Approach: Utilize shared embedding layers or align internal representations through specialized loss functions.

B. Cross-Model Consistency Losses

  • Objective: Align the outputs or intermediate representations across different models.
  • Approach: Introduce additional loss terms that penalize discrepancies between models' outputs or features.

C. Weight Sharing

  • Objective: Promote similar representations by sharing certain layers or parameters across models where feasible.
  • Approach: Identify and share compatible layers or parameters between models with similar functionalities.

7. Implementation Considerations

A. Aligning Intermediate Representations

  • Extract and compare features from corresponding layers in each model to ensure consistency in representations.

B. Projection Layers for Architectural Differences

  • Implement projection layers to map features from differing architectures into a common space, facilitating effective alignment.

C. Balancing Loss Weights

  • Carefully balance primary task loss with consistency losses to ensure that alignment does not hinder model performance.

8. Potential Challenges

  • Architectural Differences: Varying internal structures may complicate direct feature comparisons.

    • Solution: Use projection layers to map features to a shared space before computing consistency losses.

  • Computational Overhead: Introducing additional loss terms can increase computational demands.

    • Solution: Optimize training loops and selectively apply consistency losses to essential layers.

9. Next Steps

  1. Implement Feature Alignment: Modify all models to expose intermediate features required for consistency losses.
  2. Adjust Training Processes: Incorporate cross-model consistency losses into the training loops of all models.
  3. Experiment with Loss Weights: Determine optimal weights for primary and consistency losses to balance alignment with performance.
  4. Monitor and Evaluate: Continuously assess the impact of mappings on model convergence and overall performance.

10. Additional Resources

  • Deep Mutual Learning: Techniques where multiple models learn collaboratively by mimicking each other's predictions.
  • Representation Learning: Strategies for learning effective representations that capture the underlying structures in data.

By establishing a unified mapping framework, you can enhance the interoperability and performance consistency across different model architectures, paving the way for more robust and versatile machine learning solutions.