Rt Notebook example - corrected

[I-Bouros]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (abcc8e5) to head (3d7ac11).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #1523   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           97        97           
  Lines         9577      9577           
=========================================
  Hits          9577      9577           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[MichaelClerx]

Can you give a bit of background about this example? What's the reason for including it (from a PINTS point of view: which features does it highlight)?

In its current form I don't think it belong in the "toy" section of examples, as those all showcase a toy model included in the PINTS module.

If you did want to make this into a PINTS toy problem, we would have to think about how (or whether) to include the CSV data, as we would have to then package this data as part of the pints module

[I-Bouros]

Can you give a bit of background about this example? What's the reason for including it (from a PINTS point of view: which features does it highlight)?

In its current form I don't think it belong in the "toy" section of examples, as those all showcase a toy model included in the PINTS module.

If you did want to make this into a PINTS toy problem, we would have to think about how (or whether) to include the CSV data, as we would have to then package this data as part of the pints module

It's meant to be an additional example for the paper, and to showcase how someone can try and define their own logPDF objects rather than resorting to singleOutput problems. I did struggle to find a good place to include it, to be honest.

[MichaelClerx]

I suppose it could always go under "Miscellaneous", or it could go in a separate repo? (pints-team/rt-estimation-renewal-equation?), or in a repo with things related to the paper?

[MichaelClerx]

Looks good to me!

[MichaelClerx]

@ben18785 want to comment on the science of this? Or shall we just merge it in?

[MichaelClerx]

OK, in it goes!