Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

See about speeding up "rm" #298

Open
brettkettering opened this issue Aug 12, 2013 · 1 comment
Open

See about speeding up "rm" #298

brettkettering opened this issue Aug 12, 2013 · 1 comment
Assignees
@thewacokid
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@brettkettering
Copy link
Contributor

"rm" can be very slow, especially on large PLFS files. Try removing PLFS files from the FTA with threadpool_size a larger number. There was a thought that this leads to the Transport Endpoint Not Connected error.
@ghost ghost assigned thewacokid Aug 12, 2013
@brettkettering
Copy link
Contributor Author

Using "unlink" instead of "rm" is much faster. We have decided to implement "rm" in a PLFS-aware tool that understands the structure of the file it is deleting and do so in parallel and as efficiently as possible.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@thewacokid thewacokid

Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@brettkettering @thewacokid