Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Request] "jurisprudence" as an alias for entrytype "jurisdiction" #1328

Open
alercah opened this issue Dec 30, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

[Request] "jurisprudence" as an alias for entrytype "jurisdiction" #1328

alercah opened this issue Dec 30, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@alercah
Copy link

alercah commented Dec 30, 2023

I am not sure how jurisdiction came to be the entrytype for case law, but it is the wrong word. The correct word is jurisprudence.

Therefore I would propose adding jurisprudence as an alias for jurisdiction as an entrytype.

@alercah alercah changed the title Feature Request: "jurisprudence" as an alias for entrytype "jurisdiction" [Request] "jurisprudence" as an alias for entrytype "jurisdiction" Dec 30, 2023
@moewew
Copy link
Collaborator

moewew commented Jan 3, 2024

Hmm, I guess it was just a bad translation from German (assuming PL added the type). I'm wondering, though, if we really should get involved here by adding jurisprudence and deprecating jurisdiction. The standard styles don't do anything special for these types anyway.

@plk What do you think? It think it is useful to have sensibly-named entry types in the data model. But I don't want to rush unnecessary changes to the data model.

@plk
Copy link
Owner

plk commented Jan 3, 2024

I think it's fine to add a driver source map for this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants