You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, we have interval analysis that infers bounds on fluents, i.e. state in [100, 500], reward in [-1.0, 5.0]...
We also have a constraints parser that parses inequality constraints on action/state fluents, i.e. action-fluent(?x) >= non-fluent(?x) + 100..
However, we do not currently have a way to integrate them. For example, if bounds on state fluents are not stated as constraints, but clipped in the cpfs? How can they be integrated into the constraints parser to get tighter gym bounds for RDDLEnv?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, we have interval analysis that infers bounds on fluents, i.e. state in [100, 500], reward in [-1.0, 5.0]...
We also have a constraints parser that parses inequality constraints on action/state fluents, i.e. action-fluent(?x) >= non-fluent(?x) + 100..
However, we do not currently have a way to integrate them. For example, if bounds on state fluents are not stated as constraints, but clipped in the cpfs? How can they be integrated into the constraints parser to get tighter gym bounds for RDDLEnv?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: