Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simple End-of-life guide covering all unsupported versions #69483

Closed
ncoghlan opened this issue Oct 2, 2015 · 19 comments
Closed

Simple End-of-life guide covering all unsupported versions #69483

ncoghlan opened this issue Oct 2, 2015 · 19 comments
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir type-feature A feature request or enhancement

Comments

@ncoghlan
Copy link
Contributor

ncoghlan commented Oct 2, 2015

BPO 25296
Nosy @warsaw, @birkenfeld, @ncoghlan, @vstinner, @ezio-melotti, @bitdancer, @willingc, @Mariatta, @anlutro

Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

Show more details

GitHub fields:

assignee = None
closed_at = <Date 2016-01-25.01:55:22.013>
created_at = <Date 2015-10-02.05:27:49.173>
labels = ['type-feature', 'docs']
title = 'Simple End-of-life guide covering all unsupported versions'
updated_at = <Date 2018-09-15.11:42:56.018>
user = 'https://github.com/ncoghlan'

bugs.python.org fields:

activity = <Date 2018-09-15.11:42:56.018>
actor = 'Mariatta'
assignee = 'docs@python'
closed = True
closed_date = <Date 2016-01-25.01:55:22.013>
closer = 'berker.peksag'
components = ['Documentation']
creation = <Date 2015-10-02.05:27:49.173>
creator = 'ncoghlan'
dependencies = []
files = []
hgrepos = []
issue_num = 25296
keywords = []
message_count = 17.0
messages = ['252084', '252085', '252086', '252087', '252088', '252089', '252098', '252099', '252102', '252119', '252128', '252131', '252137', '252138', '258894', '325425', '325431']
nosy_count = 12.0
nosy_names = ['barry', 'georg.brandl', 'ncoghlan', 'vstinner', 'ezio.melotti', 'r.david.murray', 'docs@python', 'willingc', 'dshafik', 'glasnt', 'Mariatta', 'Andreas Lutro']
pr_nums = []
priority = 'normal'
resolution = 'fixed'
stage = 'resolved'
status = 'closed'
superseder = None
type = 'enhancement'
url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue25296'
versions = []

@ncoghlan
Copy link
Contributor Author

ncoghlan commented Oct 2, 2015

Katie McLaughlin recently pointed me at PHP's summary page for the End-of-Life dates for their various releases: http://php.net/eol.php

That seems like a useful thing to offer, but we unfortunately don't currently have a great place for this kind of documentation:

  • the main docs are version specific, while this kind of page should be version independent
  • the update process, access control model and reader experience for python.org is too different from that for the main documentation
  • ditto for the wiki
  • informational PEPs are closer from an access control perspective, but aren't generated with Sphinx and are still disconnected from the main docs from a reader perspective
  • it's off-topic for the developer guide

The "right" answer seems to be setting up a separate "docs" project on hg.python.org to use as the landing page for docs.python.org and for version independent information like this (the redirects already defined as part of PEP-430 should continue to handle unqualified deep links into the Python 2 docs).

I'm not sure how much reconfiguration work such a change would entail, though.

@ncoghlan ncoghlan added docs Documentation in the Doc dir type-feature A feature request or enhancement labels Oct 2, 2015
@ncoghlan
Copy link
Contributor Author

ncoghlan commented Oct 2, 2015

Adding Georg directly to the nosy, as I think this kind of structural question falls under his domain as the docs lead :)

@vstinner
Copy link
Member

vstinner commented Oct 2, 2015

We now putting the such page on python.org website, as PHP did?

I like the idea of being very explicit on EOL. It's a FAQ on mailing lists. Even for me, being involved in Python developments, it's not always easy to know the status of each branch. For example, I recently asked the question for Python 3.4 :-) The answer was that it will switch to security fixes only after the next 3.4.x release.

The EOL page must explain each stage of maintenance:

  • development branch: any kind of change including new features
  • bugfix: no new feature, only bugfixes including security fixes
  • security fixes only: no more binary release, only source code release, only security fixes and some execeptional bugfixes (sorry, I don't know the exact rule for bugfixes at this stage)
  • end of life: dead, no change at all

Python 2.6 reached its EOL or security fixes are still accepted?

I guess that Python <= 2.5, Python 3.0 and Python 3.1 are dead, right?

@ncoghlan
Copy link
Contributor Author

ncoghlan commented Oct 2, 2015

The branch status is captured in the release PEPs:

2.6 (& 3.0): https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0361/
2.7: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0373/
3.1: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0375/
3.2: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0392/
3.3: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0398/
3.4: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0429/
3.5: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0478/
3.6: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0494/

The "devcycle" page in the developer guide captures the details of the difference phases: https://docs.python.org/devguide/devcycle.html

So perhaps the expedient near term solution would be to put this info on the devcycle page, and move it later?

@ncoghlan
Copy link
Contributor Author

ncoghlan commented Oct 2, 2015

Items to capture for each unsupported or security fix only release series:

  • date & version of last binary release (maintenance -> security fix only transition)
  • date & version of last source-only security release (commercial redistributors are on their own for ongoing support from this point)
  • link to the release PEP
  • link to the upgrade guide in the next What's New doc once the next version is released

@ezio-melotti
Copy link
Member

  • the main docs are version specific, while this kind of page
    should be version independent

They could still be included in the main docs with a clear link at the top that says "For the most-recently updated schedule see d.p.o/3/eol.html.". Each version should still be correct -- it will just lack the eol dates for the newest releases.
The Unicode Consortium and the W3C do something similar (see e.g. http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr29/tr29-23.html and http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-html5-20140617/).

Another option is to create a new repo where to put version-independent docs (e.g. the whatsnew, maybe even Misc/NEWS). It shouldn't be difficult to then include these pages in the main docs.

@dshafik
Copy link
Mannequin

dshafik mannequin commented Oct 2, 2015

We (PHP) also have a more visual guide at http://php.net/supported-versions.php which updates dynamically to show the current status.

It shows the current status (EOL, Security only, Active) of releases from PHP 5.3, which is still the default for many LTS distros and still in common use.

@vstinner
Copy link
Member

vstinner commented Oct 2, 2015

Davey Shafik added the comment:

We (PHP) also have a more visual guide at http://php.net/supported-versions.php which updates dynamically to show the current status.

Great job! It's much easier to see the status with the summary in a
single picture.

@ezio-melotti
Copy link
Member

I like that, in fact I used the same format in my talk "The development process of Python": http://wolfprojects.altervista.org/talks/development-process-of-python-2011/ (slides 20/21).

The main problem is where to put all this though.

@bitdancer
Copy link
Member

It seems to me a link to this version independent info could logically appear on the docs front page. I think we ought to add the devguide there already, for instance. The 'Meta information' section seems perfectly appropriate...even though all the docs currently in there are maintained in the Docs directory, both 'about' and 'reporting bugs' are currently version-independent information.

@birkenfeld
Copy link
Member

It seems to me a link to this version independent info could logically appear on the docs front page.

Yes, that sounds good. I do like the PHP graph of versions too...

@birkenfeld
Copy link
Member

It should also be linked from the downloads page.

@willingc
Copy link
Contributor

willingc commented Oct 2, 2015

+1 to adding the EOF info to the Docs front page and a link from the downloads page.

Also, +1 to David's suggestion to adding the devguide as well to the front page. In the future, it would be nice to add the devguide to the CPython repo instead of having it as a standalone. It would consolidate things in to one workflow instead of a different workflow for the devguide.

P.S. Ezio - nice slide deck content :)

@willingc
Copy link
Contributor

willingc commented Oct 2, 2015

And that would be EOL (end of life) not EOF. More coffee please...

@glasnt
Copy link
Member

glasnt commented Jan 24, 2016

Hello!

I recently saw an announcement[0] about the adding of the lifecycle status right at the top of the devguide[1]. I believe this was added as part of bpo-26165[2]

Given this, can this issue be marked as Resolved?

0 - https://twitter.com/gvanrossum/status/690227337015590912
1 - https://docs.python.org/devguide/#status-of-python-branches
2 - https://bugs.python.org/issue26165

@anlutro
Copy link
Mannequin

anlutro mannequin commented Sep 15, 2018

I see this has been closed, but the page on the devguide is still really hard to find. On the python IRC channel I often see questions about this and I always have a hard time finding the page with the correct information.

If I google "python version support" or "python version end of life" or "python version lifecycle" I don't arrive at that page. For some of these searches I even end up on a separate devcycle[1] page which only contains old versions of python. Compare that to PHP, where the official "supported versions" page is the top result no matter what I search for.

Nevermind the fact that the lifecycle of python versions is relevant to non-developers as well, making it un-intuitive to go to the devguide to find this information.

I really think this needs to be made part of python.org's main website, with some good SEO.

[1] https://devguide.python.org/devcycle/

@Mariatta
Copy link
Member

This is not being tracked in:

python/pythondotorg#1302

@ezio-melotti ezio-melotti transferred this issue from another repository Apr 10, 2022
@hugovk
Copy link
Member

hugovk commented Dec 6, 2022

Update: a release cycle chart is now live at https://devguide.python.org/versions/

image

Re: issue python/docs-community#67 / PR python/devguide#988

@vstinner
Copy link
Member

vstinner commented Dec 6, 2022

Oh wow, that's amazing! Thank you very much!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir type-feature A feature request or enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

10 participants