-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Simple End-of-life guide covering all unsupported versions #69483
Comments
Katie McLaughlin recently pointed me at PHP's summary page for the End-of-Life dates for their various releases: http://php.net/eol.php That seems like a useful thing to offer, but we unfortunately don't currently have a great place for this kind of documentation:
The "right" answer seems to be setting up a separate "docs" project on hg.python.org to use as the landing page for docs.python.org and for version independent information like this (the redirects already defined as part of PEP-430 should continue to handle unqualified deep links into the Python 2 docs). I'm not sure how much reconfiguration work such a change would entail, though. |
Adding Georg directly to the nosy, as I think this kind of structural question falls under his domain as the docs lead :) |
We now putting the such page on python.org website, as PHP did? I like the idea of being very explicit on EOL. It's a FAQ on mailing lists. Even for me, being involved in Python developments, it's not always easy to know the status of each branch. For example, I recently asked the question for Python 3.4 :-) The answer was that it will switch to security fixes only after the next 3.4.x release. The EOL page must explain each stage of maintenance:
Python 2.6 reached its EOL or security fixes are still accepted? I guess that Python <= 2.5, Python 3.0 and Python 3.1 are dead, right? |
The branch status is captured in the release PEPs: 2.6 (& 3.0): https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0361/ The "devcycle" page in the developer guide captures the details of the difference phases: https://docs.python.org/devguide/devcycle.html So perhaps the expedient near term solution would be to put this info on the devcycle page, and move it later? |
Items to capture for each unsupported or security fix only release series:
|
They could still be included in the main docs with a clear link at the top that says "For the most-recently updated schedule see d.p.o/3/eol.html.". Each version should still be correct -- it will just lack the eol dates for the newest releases. Another option is to create a new repo where to put version-independent docs (e.g. the whatsnew, maybe even Misc/NEWS). It shouldn't be difficult to then include these pages in the main docs. |
We (PHP) also have a more visual guide at http://php.net/supported-versions.php which updates dynamically to show the current status. It shows the current status (EOL, Security only, Active) of releases from PHP 5.3, which is still the default for many LTS distros and still in common use. |
Davey Shafik added the comment:
Great job! It's much easier to see the status with the summary in a |
I like that, in fact I used the same format in my talk "The development process of Python": http://wolfprojects.altervista.org/talks/development-process-of-python-2011/ (slides 20/21). The main problem is where to put all this though. |
It seems to me a link to this version independent info could logically appear on the docs front page. I think we ought to add the devguide there already, for instance. The 'Meta information' section seems perfectly appropriate...even though all the docs currently in there are maintained in the Docs directory, both 'about' and 'reporting bugs' are currently version-independent information. |
Yes, that sounds good. I do like the PHP graph of versions too... |
It should also be linked from the downloads page. |
+1 to adding the EOF info to the Docs front page and a link from the downloads page. Also, +1 to David's suggestion to adding the devguide as well to the front page. In the future, it would be nice to add the devguide to the CPython repo instead of having it as a standalone. It would consolidate things in to one workflow instead of a different workflow for the devguide. P.S. Ezio - nice slide deck content :) |
And that would be EOL (end of life) not EOF. More coffee please... |
Hello! I recently saw an announcement[0] about the adding of the lifecycle status right at the top of the devguide[1]. I believe this was added as part of bpo-26165[2] Given this, can this issue be marked as Resolved? 0 - https://twitter.com/gvanrossum/status/690227337015590912 |
I see this has been closed, but the page on the devguide is still really hard to find. On the python IRC channel I often see questions about this and I always have a hard time finding the page with the correct information. If I google "python version support" or "python version end of life" or "python version lifecycle" I don't arrive at that page. For some of these searches I even end up on a separate devcycle[1] page which only contains old versions of python. Compare that to PHP, where the official "supported versions" page is the top result no matter what I search for. Nevermind the fact that the lifecycle of python versions is relevant to non-developers as well, making it un-intuitive to go to the devguide to find this information. I really think this needs to be made part of python.org's main website, with some good SEO. |
This is not being tracked in: |
Update: a release cycle chart is now live at https://devguide.python.org/versions/ Re: issue python/docs-community#67 / PR python/devguide#988 |
Oh wow, that's amazing! Thank you very much! |
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
bugs.python.org fields:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: