Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enforce local versions of objects #505

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

jaraco
Copy link
Member

@jaraco jaraco commented Sep 11, 2024

If a provider is returning objects from importlib.metadata (Distribution, Message, PackagePath), replace them with local versions for predictable types for consumers and type checkers.

Closes #486; supersedes #487

  • Add a couple of functions from jaraco.functools.
  • Create 'localize_dist' function to convert stdlib to local versions of Distributions.
  • Create 'localize_metadata' function to normalize the outputs for .metadata.
  • Create 'localize_package_path' function to convert stdlib to local versions of PackagePath.

@jaraco jaraco force-pushed the bugfix/486-local-objects branch from bd4ba0f to dba0127 Compare September 11, 2024 16:07
@jaraco
Copy link
Member Author

jaraco commented Sep 11, 2024

@abravalheri What do you think about this approach compared to #487?

The nice thing about this approach is it provides simpler type expectations for downstream consumers while also not imposing any restrictions on providers.

There's still a failing mypy check that I need to resolve, but the tests pass otherwise.

Also, it's a little bit ugly that objects that can't be converted are cast instead, which is technically incorrect, but should provide a low-disruption signal to address those objects. I'll flag that in a code comment.

Comment on lines 78 to 81
warnings.warn(f"Unrecognized distribution subclass {dist.__class__}")
return cast(importlib_metadata.Distribution, dist)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This block is perhaps the least respectable part of the proposed change. It means that any Distribution subclasses that aren't derived from importlib_metadata.Distribution or importlib.metadata.PathDistribution (e.g. a custom subclass of importlib.metadata.Distribution) will get a warning and then will possibly not comply with the interface. It's no worse than the status quo, however, except that there's no indication that a type may not be complying with an interface. At least now, a warning will be issued.

The proper fix will be for providers to supply importlib_metadata.Distribution subclasses when importlib_metadata is present.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you very much for having a look on this. The solution looks good for me, although I share the feeling that the simple cast may be a little fragile.

The proper fix will be for providers to supply importlib_metadata.Distribution subclasses when importlib_metadata is present.

Should this be officially communicated somehow to the developers? I believe that there is some opposition against using a try..except if importlib_metadata is not included explicitly as a package dependency. We can see an example of that feeling in the thread starting with pypa/pyproject-hooks#195 (comment).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure how the core devs would feel about adding this as a "tip" or recommendation in the importlib.metadata docs...

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be officially communicated somehow to the developers?

Yes, probably.

Not sure how the core devs would feel about adding this as a "tip" or recommendation in the importlib.metadata docs...

It should go wherever the docs are that provide guidance for providers. I'll figure out where that is and include it here or link it.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In python/cpython#123976, I've filed an issue upstream to track the documentation, but as I think more about what the documentation says, I'm not confident in the approach. I'll continue the conversation in #486.

@jaraco jaraco force-pushed the bugfix/486-local-objects branch from 9504147 to 4b4b091 Compare September 11, 2024 16:52
@jaraco
Copy link
Member Author

jaraco commented Sep 11, 2024

Tests are passing now on all but Python 3.8 and 3.9. They're failing on the project unit (pytest-checkdocs). It seems that the warning functionality is somehow getting triggered for pytest-checkdocs even though the class is of the intended type:

.::project
tests/data/sources/example2::project
  /home/runner/work/importlib_metadata/importlib_metadata/importlib_metadata/_compat.py:80: UserWarning: Unrecognized distribution subclass <class 'importlib_metadata.PathDistribution'>
    warnings.warn(f"Unrecognized distribution subclass {dist.__class__}")

Surely importlib_metadata.PathDistribution is an instance of importlib_metadata.Distribution. I need to figure out what's causing that not to be the case.

@jaraco
Copy link
Member Author

jaraco commented Sep 11, 2024

I think there are two issues going on:

First, when running under pytest, some modules (namely plugins) get imported early, before assertion rewriting is turned on. That includes pytest_checkdocs, which imports jaraco.packaging which imports build, which imports importlib_metadata. When later importlib_metadata is re-imported with the assert-rewrite support, a new copy is imported such that the types aren't comparable using isinstance:

> /Users/jaraco/code/python/importlib_metadata/importlib_metadata/_compat.py(82)localize_dist()
-> return cast(importlib_metadata.Distribution, dist)
(Pdb) importlib_metadata
<module 'importlib_metadata' from '/Users/jaraco/code/python/importlib_metadata/importlib_metadata/__init__.py'>
(Pdb) build._compat.importlib.metadata
<module 'importlib_metadata' from '/Users/jaraco/code/python/importlib_metadata/importlib_metadata/__init__.py'>
(Pdb) importlib_metadata is build._compat.importlib.metadata
False

A second, related issue, is that the same issue happens during localize_metadata. Because the isinstance check fails, the importlib_metadata._adapters.Message object gets re-constructed from an existing message (of the same class), causing the redent function to be invoked twice on the Description, mangling the reStructuredText (by adding ' '*8 at the beginning).

@jaraco jaraco force-pushed the bugfix/486-local-objects branch from aa9c5ce to 9fae83b Compare September 11, 2024 18:25
@jaraco
Copy link
Member Author

jaraco commented Sep 11, 2024

I notice there is some small impact on performance:

exercises.py:cached distribution: 0:00:00.000302 (+0:00:00.000007, 2%)
exercises.py:discovery: 0:00:00.000300 (+0:00:00.000003, 1%)
exercises.py:entry_points(): 0:00:00.002260 (+0:00:00.000040, 2%)
exercises.py:entrypoint_regexp_perf: 0:00:00.000059 (+0:00:00.000001, 2%)
exercises.py:uncached distribution: 0:00:00.000452 (+0:00:00.000002, 0%)

Nothing too scary.

@jaraco jaraco force-pushed the bugfix/486-local-objects branch from 9fae83b to 4a350a5 Compare September 11, 2024 18:32
@jaraco
Copy link
Member Author

jaraco commented Sep 11, 2024

I think there are two issues going on:

I confirmed that running pytest --assert plain against 1a30e01 (prior to the workarounds), the tests pass, confirming that the issue was indeed isolated to the pytest assert rewrite importer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

API incompatibility with importlib.metadata (or at least the API is not type-safe?)
2 participants