Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove N=1 check when decoding a literal field line with name reference #52

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 4, 2024

Conversation

marten-seemann
Copy link
Member

Fixes #51.

This field is only used to determine if the dynamic table can be used when this field is re-encoded. Since we currently don't support use of the dynamic table, the N value is irrelevant.

@DineshAdhi @kixcord Could you take a quick look at this PR?

This field is only used to determine if the dynamic table can be used
when this field is re-encoded. Since we currently don't support use of
the dynamic table, the N value is irrelevant.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.42%. Comparing base (9160514) to head (b6dae4c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #52   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.42%   91.42%           
=======================================
  Files           5        5           
  Lines         233      233           
=======================================
  Hits          213      213           
  Misses         11       11           
  Partials        9        9           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@kixelated kixelated left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@marten-seemann marten-seemann merged commit 696c8e2 into master Sep 4, 2024
11 checks passed
@marten-seemann marten-seemann deleted the n-bit branch September 7, 2024 03:28
@DineshAdhi
Copy link

Changes look good. Tested and its working with the moq-rs.

@marten-seemann
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for testing and reporting back!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

potential bug with N-bit set to 1
3 participants