You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Current behavior is to report "nan" for allele2 if it is short. It would be nice to have an estimated allele size for both allele1 and allele2, even when both alleles are short.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Current thinking about this both for my future reference and to get feedback:
Extremely difficult to differentiate between the sizes of two different large alleles, so need to be able to flag this somehow in the output.
For shorter alleles, could provide point estimate possibly along with min/max/error bars as well as report no. of reads supporting each allele.
Also consider how to provide a quality score based, for example, on number of reads or how difficult to assign supporting reads between two alleles of similar size?
Is part of the problem trying to determine if the individual in fact has two short alleles or just appears to because there is a missed larger allele? In terms of practical use, I would imagine this would be mostly about eliminating possible disease loci from consideration if the individual has two small alleles and no large ones.
Current behavior is to report "nan" for allele2 if it is short. It would be nice to have an estimated allele size for both allele1 and allele2, even when both alleles are short.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: