fix: correctly calculate arity of lambda functions #6
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
netomi
force-pushed
the
fix-arity-of-lambda-functions
branch
from
030a000
to
fa0a5fd
Compare
|
Thanks @netomi , I'll take a look |
rayokota
approved these changes
Sep 22, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently you cant use a lambda function in combination with functions like map as the arity of the lambda function is calculated in a way that does not work.
This fix uses the suggested method to calculate the number of parameters for a callable, see https://stackoverflow.com/a/41188411