Skip to content

reccleston/song-predictions

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

song-reccomendations

logo

Billboard Charts Machine Learning Project Team Members: Sarah D. Hood, Jini Hassan, Ryan Eccleston-Murdock, Wasif Khan, Angeli Lucila, Ivana Korak

Datasets we used:

1. Top Songs 2015-2019 dataset:

https://www.kaggle.com/leonardopena/top-spotify-songs-from-20102019-by-year

Context: The top songs BY YEAR in the world by spotify. This dataset has several variables about the songs and is based on Billboard Content: There are the most popular songs in the world by year and 13 variables to be explored. Data were extracted from: http://organizeyourmusic.playlistmachinery.com/

Attributes Measured:

  • Top Song: whether the song is on the Billboard Top 100 for that week (1 - Yes, 0 - No)
  • Popularity/pop: how popular a song is. The higher the number, the more popular it is.
  • Speechiness/spch: how much spoken word is in the track.
  • Acoustic-ness/acous: how acoustic the song is.
  • Duration/dur: how long the track is (in seconds).
  • Valence/val: how positive the track is.
  • Liveness/live: how likely it is for the track to be a live recording.
  • Decibels/dB: how loud the track is.
  • Danceability/dnce: how easy it is to dance to the song.
  • Energy/nrgy: how energetic the song is.
  • Beats Per Minute/bpm: how many beats per minute, or, the track‚Äôs tempo.

2. Top Songs 2020 dataset:

https://www.billboard.com/charts/year-end/2020/hot-100-songs

Context: Year-End Hot 100 Songs

3. Spotify Songs and Attributes:

https://www.kaggle.com/yamaerenay/spotify-dataset-19212020-160k-tracks?select=artists.csv

Context: Large-Scale Dataset from Spotify API

Summary & Motivation:

We were inspired to continue working with the music industry in general and related datasets, and include suitable machine learning models, such as logistic regression and SVM to draw connections between song attributes of ‘Hit’ and ‘Non-Hit’ to predict future weekly billboard top 100 songs.

We used the top songs 2020 dataset in combination with scraping of the top 100 weekly Billboard lists, and calls to the Spotify API to compile a CSV containing both ‘Hit’ and ‘Non-Hit’ songs between 2018 and 2021. We will train this dataset using machine learning models to predict the top genre(s) and artist(s) likely to appear in the weekly Billboard top 100 for 2021.

We identified individual song characteristics (for example, how long a song has been on the chart, its peak position, etc.) and used these defining attributes of ‘Hit’ songs to forecast the following week’s top 100 Billboard songs.

Initial Hypothesis & Learnings

Continuing off our last project , our initial assumption was that the attributes of the songs directly correlated with the popularity of the song, and essentially, whether that song would be on the Billboard chart. These attributes are listed above. However from our initial analysis in Tableau, we saw that many of the top songs that had a high danceability value were not classified as “hit songs.” This showed us that the attributes did not correlate to popularity as we initially hypothesized - we confirmed this by running a Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest Classifier to show the importance of each feature, pictured below:

Song_Story Fig. 1: Top Songs Barchart showed that Top Danceable Songs were not Hits

Features Fig. 2: Feature Importance Barchart showed stronger importance in Billboard Attributes

This led us to pivot our inputs for our machine learning models to include more insightful information like the attributes listed in the Billboard dataset. Some examples of these new attributes are: Chart position of test data Previous position of test data Numbers of weeks on the billboard chart Peak position on the billboard chart

Classification Models Used:

  • Logistic Regression Classification
  • Support Vector Machine (SVM)
  • Random Forest Classifer

Key Takewaways

  • Machine Learning requires large ammounts of data to train on... which can be time consuming.
  • High Accuracy Rate in models do not necessarily deem it as a good classification model.
  • Addition of more "Human Features" (such as Chart Position, Previous Chart Position, Song Peak, Number of Weeks on Billboard Chart) significantly influenced the model's performance.

Using these models we've attained a 98% accuracy in predicting whether a song will be a Hit song in the next time period.

Logistic Regression Fig. 3: Logistic Regression Model

Random Forest Fig. 4: Random Forest Classifier

SVM-1 SVM-2 Fig. 5 & 6: Support Vector Model

SVM-plot Fig. 7: Dimensionally reduced data plotted alongside separating hyperplane

Folders Directory:

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Contributors 4

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •