-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 184
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed an indentation issue in 'prometheus-ocs-rules.yaml' file #2921
Fixed an indentation issue in 'prometheus-ocs-rules.yaml' file #2921
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar Mohan <amohan@redhat.com>
@aruniiird: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-951](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/DFBUGS-951), which is invalid:
Comment In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
I can reproduce this issue on my 4.18 cluster, all ocs exporter realted alerting rules are missing. |
/jira refresh |
@aruniiird: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-951](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/DFBUGS-951), which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@aruniiird: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-951](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/DFBUGS-951), which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (vkathole@redhat.com), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/cherry-pick release-4.18 |
@aruniiird: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@umangachapagain , @iamniting , can you please take a look? This is a test blocker (for one of the epic-happy-path) and QE cannot proceed without this. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: aruniiird, iamniting The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@aruniiird: This pull request references [Jira Issue DFBUGS-951](https://issues.redhat.com//browse/DFBUGS-951), which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (vkathole@redhat.com), skipping review request. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@aruniiird: No Jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
61f6999
into
red-hat-storage:main
@aruniiird: new pull request created: #2929 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
DFBUGS-951