-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add sync test pipeline #39
Add sync test pipeline #39
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, just some general questions around resources and credentials above.
- ReadWriteOnce | ||
resources: | ||
requests: | ||
storage: 10Gi |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would be interesting to understand how much storage is required in the long run, as 10Gi seems like a lot on paper with examples in tekton.dev showing 16Mb in examples.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point this is way too much and not needed. This is leftover from the previous test pipeline and is not needed anymore since we take the test output.
I removed the use of workspace
|
||
fi | ||
- name: VERSION | ||
value: '4.12' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Discussed this, this is the openshift-client used on the cluster running Pipelines (Tekton), for us its 4.12 for now. Something to keep in mind to put into the README in case futures require running the pipeline on 4.13+ Hub clusters.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, minus one comment around 4.12 OCP client. Not enough to require feedback / things to address before merging.
No description provided.