Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[riscv] refactor functions that register read/write via progbuf #901

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 17, 2023

Conversation

aap-sc
Copy link
Collaborator

@aap-sc aap-sc commented Aug 6, 2023

The motivation for this refactor is to fixup error handling for some corner cases. These *_progbuf functions unconditionally attempt to cache S0 register and only then perform a bunch of extra checks to figure out if the requested register is a valid one. The problem is that there are few corner cases when _*progbuf functions could receive a GPR as an input. For example, an abstract read could fail (for whatever reason) leading to infinite recursion:

save S0 -> read S0 -> save S0 -> read S0 -> ...

The case described above could be fixed by adding extra sanitity checks, however I decided to make these functions more modular since I find self-contained functions easier to read.

Change-Id: I01f57bf474ca45ebb67a30cd4d8fdef21f307c7d

@aap-sc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

aap-sc commented Aug 6, 2023

The issue mentioned above can be reproduced on spike if #900 is NOT applied (apparently, #900 hides this problem).

Reproduction (I've tried to reduce it and this is what I've got):

  1. Target configuration file:
proc init_targets {} {
        jtag newtap riscv tap -irlen 5
        target create cpu0.riscv riscv -endian little -chain-position riscv.tap -coreid 0
        target create cpu1.riscv riscv -endian little -chain-position riscv.tap -coreid 1
}
  1. Test script:
proc run_test {} {
  foreach t [target names] {
    targets $t
    halt
  }
  foreach t [target names] {
    targets $t
    resume
  }
  foreach t [target names] {
    targets $t
    halt
  }
  # entry point
  reg pc 0x80000000
  shutdown
}

  1. Spike command line:
# make sure that entry point of the elf is at 0x80000000
spike \
  --rbb-port=33627 \
  --isa=rv64gc \
  --dm-progsize=6 \
  --dm-sba=0 \
  --dm-abstract-rti=0 \
  -p4 \
  -m0x80000000:0xa00000 \
  <some_elf_file>
  1. OpenOCD invocation:
openocd -c "adapter driver remote_bitbang" -c "remote_bitbang port 33271" -c "remote_bitbang host 127.0.0.1" \
  -f config.cfg  -d2 -c init -f run_test.tcl -c run_test
openocd -c "adapter driver remote_bitbang" -c "remote_bitbang port 33271" -c "remote_bitbang host 127.0.0.1" \
  -f config.cfg  -d2 -c init -f run_test.tcl -c run_test

During the second invocation OpenOCD will crash due to stack overflow (because of infinite recursion).

@aap-sc
Copy link
Collaborator Author

aap-sc commented Aug 6, 2023

Note: the intention of this patch is only to fix infinite recursion. The reason we have such a situation on spike with no apparent reason is another matter.

Copy link
Collaborator

@JanMatCodasip JanMatCodasip left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will need to return to this one again for a more thorough review. However, overall, this looks very good.

These *_progbuf functions unconditionally attempt to cache S0 register and only then perform a bunch of extra checks to figure out if the requested register is a valid one. The problem is that there are few corner cases when _*progbuf functions could receive a GPR as an input.

I fully agree. The *_progbuf functions should refuse invalid input argument (in this case, unsupported register type) at the very beginning, before attempting any further actions.

I also support the split of the original register_{read,write}_progbuf to the smaller functions.

else if (number >= GDB_REGNO_CSR0 && number <= GDB_REGNO_CSR4095)
return register_write_to_csr_progbuf(target, number, value);

LOG_ERROR("Unsupported register: %s", gdb_regno_name(number));
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried to reword this to make it more understandable for users:

Suggested change
LOG_ERROR("Unsupported register: %s", gdb_regno_name(number));
LOG_TARGET_ERROR(target, "Write to register %s via program buffer not supported.", gdb_regno_name(number));

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, will address. Thanks!

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

addressed, though, I've changed the message a little bit.

else if (number >= GDB_REGNO_CSR0 && number <= GDB_REGNO_CSR4095)
return register_read_from_csr_progbuf(target, value, number);

LOG_TARGET_ERROR(target, "Unsupported register: %s", gdb_regno_name(number));
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(For clarity of the message:)

Suggested change
LOG_TARGET_ERROR(target, "Unsupported register: %s", gdb_regno_name(number));
LOG_TARGET_ERROR(target, "Reading register %s via program buffer is not supported.", gdb_regno_name(number));

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this one is addressed too

Copy link
Collaborator

@timsifive timsifive left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good overall.

src/target/riscv/riscv-013.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/target/riscv/riscv-013.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/target/riscv/riscv-013.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/target/riscv/riscv-013.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/target/riscv/riscv-013.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/target/riscv/riscv-013.c Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
The motivation for this refactor is to fixup error handling for some
corner cases. These functions attempt to cache S0 register and only then
perform a bunch of extra checks to figure out if the requested register
is valid one in this context. The problem is that there are few corner
cases when _*progbuf functions could receive a GPR as an input. For
example, an abstract read could fail (for whatever reason) leading to
infinite recursion:

````
save S0 -> read S0 -> save S0 -> read S0 -> ...
```

The case described above could be fixed by adding extra sanitity checks,
however I decided to make these functions more modular since I find
self-contained functions easier to read.

Change-Id: I01f57bf474ca45ebb67a30cd4d8fdef21f307c7d
Signed-off-by: Parshintsev Anatoly <anatoly.parshintsev@syntacore.com>
@aap-sc aap-sc force-pushed the aap-sc/refactor_reg_rw_progbuf branch from 827a76f to a8fedeb Compare August 15, 2023 14:54
@timsifive timsifive merged commit f061623 into riscv-collab:riscv Aug 17, 2023
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants