You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Just to make bicycle model calculation more clear to me.
Assuming both wheels are on the same circle of radius R (that is exactly the no slip assumption)
then pure trigonometry gives w / R = tan(alpha) (as both radius are perpendicular to wheels)
and then with beta = d / R
we obtain beta = d / w * tan(alpha)
otherwise the relationship beta = d / w * tan(alpha) at the beginning seems to come "out of the hat".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Many thanks for this fantastic book
Just to make bicycle model calculation more clear to me.
Assuming both wheels are on the same circle of radius R (that is exactly the no slip assumption)
then pure trigonometry gives w / R = tan(alpha) (as both radius are perpendicular to wheels)
and then with beta = d / R
we obtain beta = d / w * tan(alpha)
otherwise the relationship beta = d / w * tan(alpha) at the beginning seems to come "out of the hat".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: