From bb7820eee58d2ddab995b457da6f839dc4e69fc2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Dr. Ralf S. Engelschall" Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 08:44:25 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Update README.md --- README.md | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 28a06e1..9fe8cc3 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Copyright (c) 2015-2017 Ralf S. Engelschall <[rse@engelschall.com](mailto:rse Partially based on [code snippets](http://git.io/es6features) by Luke Hoban.
Licensed under MIT license. -This is the source of the website [es6-features.org](http://es6-features.org/), +This is the source of the website [rse.github.io/es6-features/](https://rse.github.io/es6-features/), a small overview of current [ECMAScript 6](http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-262.htm) language features and a comparison to their old @@ -66,8 +66,8 @@ ECMAScript 5 equivalents. shown style on the website. If you even need to enforce a particular style for both ES6 and ES5 code snippets in your bookmarks, just use one of the following URLs: - [ES6-Features (reduced style)](http://es6-features.org/#reduced) or - [ES6-Features (traditional style)](http://es6-features.org/#traditional) + [ES6-Features (reduced style)]( https://rse.github.io/es6-features/#reduced) or + [ES6-Features (traditional style)]( https://rse.github.io/es6-features/#traditional) - *I still don't understand: why should I use ECMAScript 6? ECMAScript 5 looks sufficient.* @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ ECMAScript 5 equivalents. - *I've found a mistake, how can I contribute?* - The source is the file `features.txt`, everything else on [es6-features.org](http://es6-features.org) is + The source is the file `features.txt`, everything else on [rse.github.io/es6-features/](https://rse.github.io/es6-features/) is just generated out of it. Fork this project on Github, edit the file `features.txt` and then please send a pull request.