Update #start_with? to match String#start_with signature

[tpendragon]

Faraday recently started expecting a string-like #start_with? signature, where you can pass multiple strings to test against and it returns true if any of them passes. We were passing an RDF Value to Faraday since the API was mostly consistent.

It seems like the intent is to have the same API as String#start_with?, so this replicates it.

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[tpendragon]

I don't really know what's going on with the failed CI, some help would be great @gkellogg if you get a chance to look at this.

[coveralls]

coverage: 91.739%. remained the same
when pulling 47192eb on tpendragon:fix_start_with
into 5e32ea6 on ruby-rdf:develop.

[gkellogg]

I don't really know what's going on with the failed CI, some help would be great @gkellogg if you get a chance to look at this.

Sometimes just rerunning the failed tests fixes it. All green now.

[gkellogg]

Looks like an omission from long ago. Are their other method definitions that also need to be touched?

[tpendragon]

Looks like an omission from long ago. Are their other method definitions that also need to be touched?

I'm not sure, this was just the one giving us problems in samvera/valkyrie#958

[gkellogg]

Looks like an omission from long ago. Are their other method definitions that also need to be touched?

I'm not sure, this was just the one giving us problems in samvera/valkyrie#958

That is, in fact, the only such method definition.

Thanks for the contribution, I'll get an updated release out including this shortly.