Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update COMPARED_WITH_PRY.md #984

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

alessandro-fazzi
Copy link
Contributor

Document cd object and cd .. commands introduced in 1.14.0 by #971

| Syntax highlighting | Yes | Yes | |
| Command shell integration | Yes | No | Currently, there's no plan to support such features in IRB |
| Navigation | - `cd object` to enter `object` <br/> - `cd ..` to leave the current object <br/> - `nesting` to list nesting levels | - `pushws object` <br/> - `popws` <br/> - `workspaces` <br /> - `cd object`/`cd ..` (since [1.14.0](https://github.com/ruby/irb/releases/tag/v1.14.0)) | We plan to refine IRB's commands in the future |
| Runtime invocation | `binding.pry` | 👋 IRB is on a mission to match feature parity with Pry. This document is here to help us track the similarities and differences between the two. | |
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think from here and below the table is mixed with other things?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ouch. It's so brutal to me to edit MD tables. 😖 Sorry and thanks. That's fixed.

Document `cd object` and `cd ..` commands introduced in 1.14.0 by ruby#971
Copy link
Member

@st0012 st0012 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@st0012 st0012 merged commit b205907 into ruby:master Aug 4, 2024
30 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants