Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add pattern matching support for list random access patterns #1143

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024

Conversation

dwightguth
Copy link
Collaborator

This is not rigorously tested, nor is it likely to be in the near future because the code it was written to support ended up not being worth merging. However, it is broadly useful code that may find value in the future, so I would like to get it merged.

It also includes a few fixes to python scripts in the repo that had gone slightly stale.

@rv-jenkins rv-jenkins changed the base branch from master to develop September 9, 2024 19:56
@dwightguth dwightguth marked this pull request as ready for review September 11, 2024 15:18
Copy link
Collaborator

@Robertorosmaninho Robertorosmaninho left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I couldn’t spot anything obvious that would prevent me from approving this PR, but I’m not very familiar with this code either. I’ll let @theo25 give the final approval on that.

I would like to see, if not some tests, at least some instructions on how we could execute it ourselves. It may be a helpful starting point for us in the future if we want to fully support it in K.

Copy link
Collaborator

@theo25 theo25 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

@dwightguth dwightguth merged commit dafe4ec into develop Sep 11, 2024
10 checks passed
@dwightguth dwightguth deleted the list-set branch September 11, 2024 20:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants