Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Automatic deploy to GitHub Pages: 998c780
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
GHA CI committed Dec 28, 2024
1 parent 2c999fb commit e0d7dc4
Showing 1 changed file with 21 additions and 4 deletions.
25 changes: 21 additions & 4 deletions master/index.html
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4367,9 +4367,9 @@ <h3>Example</h3>
<pre><code class="language-rust">61_864_918_973_511
</code></pre>
</div><div class="lint-additional-info-container"><div class="lint-additional-info-item"><span> Applicability: </span><span class="label label-default label-applicability">MaybeIncorrect</span><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_lint_defs/enum.Applicability.html#variants">(?)</a></div><div class="lint-additional-info-item"><span>Added in: </span><span class="label label-default label-version">pre 1.29.0</span></div><div class="lint-additional-info-item"><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+inconsistent_digit_grouping">Related Issues</a></div><div class="lint-additional-info-item"><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/blob/master/clippy_lints/src/literal_representation.rs#L63">View Source</a></div></div></div></article><article class="panel panel-default" id="inconsistent_struct_constructor"><input id="label-inconsistent_struct_constructor" type="checkbox"><label for="label-inconsistent_struct_constructor" onclick="highlightIfNeeded('inconsistent_struct_constructor')"><header class="panel-heading"><h2 class="panel-title"><div class="panel-title-name" id="lint-inconsistent_struct_constructor"><span>inconsistent_struct_constructor</span> <a href="#inconsistent_struct_constructor" onclick="lintAnchor(event)" class="anchor label label-default">&para;</a> <a href="" class="anchor label label-default" onclick="copyToClipboard(event)">&#128203;</a></div><div class="panel-title-addons"><span class="label label-lint-group label-default label-group-pedantic">pedantic</span> <span class="label label-lint-level label-lint-level-allow">allow</span> <span class="label label-doc-folding"></span></div></h2></header></label><div class="list-group lint-docs"><div class="list-group-item lint-doc-md"><h3>What it does</h3>
<p>Checks for struct constructors where all fields are shorthand and
the order of the field init shorthand in the constructor is inconsistent
with the order in the struct definition.</p>
<p>Checks for struct constructors where the order of the field
init in the constructor is inconsistent with the order in the
struct definition.</p>
<h3>Why is this bad?</h3>
<p>Since the order of fields in a constructor doesn’t affect the
resulted instance as the below example indicates,</p>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -4398,7 +4398,24 @@ <h3>Example</h3>
<p>Use instead:</p>
<pre><code class="language-rust">Foo { x, y };
</code></pre>
</div><div class="lint-additional-info-container"><div class="lint-additional-info-item"><span> Applicability: </span><span class="label label-default label-applicability">MachineApplicable</span><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_lint_defs/enum.Applicability.html#variants">(?)</a></div><div class="lint-additional-info-item"><span>Added in: </span><span class="label label-default label-version">1.52.0</span></div><div class="lint-additional-info-item"><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+inconsistent_struct_constructor">Related Issues</a></div><div class="lint-additional-info-item"><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/blob/master/clippy_lints/src/inconsistent_struct_constructor.rs#L12">View Source</a></div></div></div></article><article class="panel panel-default" id="index_refutable_slice"><input id="label-index_refutable_slice" type="checkbox"><label for="label-index_refutable_slice" onclick="highlightIfNeeded('index_refutable_slice')"><header class="panel-heading"><h2 class="panel-title"><div class="panel-title-name" id="lint-index_refutable_slice"><span>index_refutable_slice</span> <a href="#index_refutable_slice" onclick="lintAnchor(event)" class="anchor label label-default">&para;</a> <a href="" class="anchor label label-default" onclick="copyToClipboard(event)">&#128203;</a></div><div class="panel-title-addons"><span class="label label-lint-group label-default label-group-pedantic">pedantic</span> <span class="label label-lint-level label-lint-level-allow">allow</span> <span class="label label-doc-folding"></span></div></h2></header></label><div class="list-group lint-docs"><div class="list-group-item lint-doc-md"><h3>What it does</h3>
<h3>Configuration</h3>
<ul>
<li><code>lint-inconsistent-struct-field-initializers</code>: Whether to suggest reordering constructor fields when initializers are present.</li>
</ul>
<p>Warnings produced by this configuration aren’t necessarily fixed by just reordering the fields. Even if the
suggested code would compile, it can change semantics if the initializer expressions have side effects. The
following example <a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/11846#issuecomment-1820747924">from rust-clippy#11846</a> shows how the suggestion can run into borrow check errors:</p>
<pre><code class="language-rust">struct MyStruct {
vector: Vec&lt;u32&gt;,
length: usize
}
fn main() {
let vector = vec![1,2,3];
MyStruct { length: vector.len(), vector};
}
</code></pre>
<p>(default: <code>false</code>)</p>
</div><div class="lint-additional-info-container"><div class="lint-additional-info-item"><span> Applicability: </span><span class="label label-default label-applicability">MachineApplicable</span><a href="https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_lint_defs/enum.Applicability.html#variants">(?)</a></div><div class="lint-additional-info-item"><span>Added in: </span><span class="label label-default label-version">1.52.0</span></div><div class="lint-additional-info-item"><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues?q=is%3Aissue+inconsistent_struct_constructor">Related Issues</a></div><div class="lint-additional-info-item"><a href="https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/blob/master/clippy_lints/src/inconsistent_struct_constructor.rs#L14">View Source</a></div></div></div></article><article class="panel panel-default" id="index_refutable_slice"><input id="label-index_refutable_slice" type="checkbox"><label for="label-index_refutable_slice" onclick="highlightIfNeeded('index_refutable_slice')"><header class="panel-heading"><h2 class="panel-title"><div class="panel-title-name" id="lint-index_refutable_slice"><span>index_refutable_slice</span> <a href="#index_refutable_slice" onclick="lintAnchor(event)" class="anchor label label-default">&para;</a> <a href="" class="anchor label label-default" onclick="copyToClipboard(event)">&#128203;</a></div><div class="panel-title-addons"><span class="label label-lint-group label-default label-group-pedantic">pedantic</span> <span class="label label-lint-level label-lint-level-allow">allow</span> <span class="label label-doc-folding"></span></div></h2></header></label><div class="list-group lint-docs"><div class="list-group-item lint-doc-md"><h3>What it does</h3>
<p>The lint checks for slice bindings in patterns that are only used to
access individual slice values.</p>
<h3>Why is this bad?</h3>
Expand Down

0 comments on commit e0d7dc4

Please sign in to comment.