Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add "OpenTelemetry" to default doc_valid_idents #11926

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2024

Conversation

edmorley
Copy link
Contributor

@edmorley edmorley commented Dec 4, 2023

The OpenTelemetry project's name is all one word (see https://opentelemetry.io), so currently triggers a false positive in the doc_markdown lint.

The project is increasing rapidly in popularity, so it seems like a worthy contender for inclusion in the default doc_valid_idents configuration.

I've also moved the existing "OpenDNS" entry earlier in the list, to restore the alphabetical ordering of that "Open*" row.

The docs changes were generated using cargo collect-metadata.

changelog: [doc_markdown]: Add OpenTelemetry to the default configuration as an allowed identifier

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 4, 2023

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Alexendoo (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Dec 4, 2023
@edmorley
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't suppose someone has a moment to review this? :-)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 27, 2023

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #12018) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@blyxyas
Copy link
Member

blyxyas commented Dec 27, 2023

@edmorley I'll review it since it seems like Alex is busy (and I kinda caused the merge conflict 😬)

The OpenTelemetry project's name is all one word (see https://opentelemetry.io),
so currently triggers a false positive in the `doc_markdown` lint.

The project is increasing rapidly in popularity, so it seems like a worthy
contender for inclusion in the default `doc_valid_idents` configuration.

I've also moved the existing "OpenDNS" entry earlier in the list, to restore
the alphabetical ordering of that "Open*" row.

The docs changes were generated using `cargo collect-metadata`.

changelog: [`doc_markdown`]: Add `OpenTelemetry` to the default configuration as an allowed identifier
@edmorley edmorley force-pushed the update-default-doc_valid_idents branch from 0a10da8 to a16a850 Compare January 15, 2024 14:27
@edmorley
Copy link
Contributor Author

@blyxyas Thank you. I've rebased on master to resolve the merge conflicts :-)

Copy link
Member

@blyxyas blyxyas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks! ❤️

@blyxyas
Copy link
Member

blyxyas commented Jan 15, 2024

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 15, 2024

📌 Commit a16a850 has been approved by blyxyas

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 15, 2024

⌛ Testing commit a16a850 with merge 771a2a9...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 15, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: blyxyas
Pushing 771a2a9 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 771a2a9 into rust-lang:master Jan 15, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants