chore(ci): do not run ci on pushes to main or dev #2027
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent updates to the GitHub Actions workflows modify the triggering conditions for CI processes by excluding the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![codecov[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/254?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The changes in the provided Git diff are primarily about limiting the trigger of the workflow to particular branches. However, this approach could potentially disable continuous integration(CI) on the 'main' and 'dev' branches. Adhering to common practices, we would want CI to run on every push action to any branches especially to 'main' and 'dev' branches. This is to ensure the code merged/pushed into these branches are always in a healthy state. Without CI on these branches, there might be serious risks for unnoticed errors.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The changes to the workflow configuration mostly look good. There is, however, a potential logic conflict as the workflow is set to trigger on all branches except for 'main' and 'dev' when a push is made. This might not be the desired behavior for the project. Also, there are no branches specified for pull_request and workflow_dispatch events, which could lead to unexpected behavior.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/node.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
.github/workflows/node.yml (1)
5-7: Verify the impact of excludingmainanddevbranches from CI triggers.The changes exclude pushes to the
mainanddevbranches from triggering the CI workflow. Ensure that this aligns with your CI/CD strategy and that no critical builds are missed as a result.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #2027 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 30.08% 33.20% +3.11%
==========================================
Files 207 207
Lines 9033 13593 +4560
Branches 349 480 +131
==========================================
+ Hits 2718 4513 +1795
- Misses 6315 9080 +2765
*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
github-merge-queue
bot
removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks
| @@ -12,11 +12,11 @@ | |||
| name: "CodeQL" | |||
|
|
|||
| on: | |||
| push: | |||
| branches: [main] | |||
| # push: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Disabling CodeQL analysis on push to main might be a risk. This would mean no static code analysis would be performed to identify vulnerabilities when code is pushed onto the main branch.
| @@ -2,8 +2,12 @@ name: Node.js CI | |||
|
|
|||
| on: | |||
| push: | |||
| branches: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Skipping push event actions on 'main' branch could lead to untested code getting into 'main', which is generally considered as production-ready or release branch. We should ensure all tests and actions are still performed on push to these 'main' branch to prevent any issues with the production code.
| pull_request: | ||
| workflow_dispatch: | ||
| merge_group: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The 'merge_group:' key does not exist in GitHub action workflows. Carefully review the workflow yaml configurations for valid syntax.
| @@ -12,11 +12,11 @@ | |||
| name: "CodeQL" | |||
|
|
|||
| on: | |||
| push: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Commenting out 'push' events on line 9 and 10 suggests that the workflow will not run on push events. Ensuring regular code scans are run can be important for maintaining code quality; you may want to reconsider this change.
| @@ -12,11 +12,11 @@ | |||
| name: "CodeQL" | |||
|
|
|||
| on: | |||
| push: | |||
| branches: [main] | |||
| # push: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Commenting out lining 11 and 12 results in all branches triggering a workflow run when a pull request is made. Depending on your project's branch strategy this may be excessive and cause unnecessary use of action minutes.
| @@ -2,8 +2,12 @@ name: Node.js CI | |||
|
|
|||
| on: | |||
| push: | |||
| branches: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
On line 28, the 'branches' trigger is set to exclude 'main' and 'dev'. The reason should be clarified and relevant documentation updated accordingly.
| pull_request: | ||
| workflow_dispatch: | ||
| merge_group: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
On line 33, 'merge_group' is not a known event type in GitHub Actions. Please correct this to a valid trigger event type.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/node.yml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/node.yml
|
|
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
mainanddevbranches, streamlining the development process and optimizing CI resource management.mainbranch while maintaining the scheduled analysis.