New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Make macro work in place of anonymous function #11

Open

ryanstull opened this issue Sep 27, 2024 · 0 comments

Labels

bug

Owner

ryanstull commented Sep 27, 2024

The macro should work in the following situation:

case class A(b: B)
case class B(c: C)
case class C(d: D)
case class D(s: String)

def expectFunction[T](f: A => T): T = ...

expectFunction(?(_.b.c.d.s))

Current it works if you do:

expectFunction(a => ?(a.b.c.d.s))

but it would be nice to be able to use the simpler syntax

ryanstull added the bug label

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment