Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 12, 2024. It is now read-only.

add ultralytics summary github action #223

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 24, 2024

Conversation

SeeknnDestroy
Copy link
Collaborator

@SeeknnDestroy SeeknnDestroy commented Jan 23, 2024

πŸ› οΈ PR Summary

Made with ❀️ by Ultralytics Actions

🌟 Summary

Added a new GitHub Actions workflow to automate code formatting and PR summaries.

πŸ“Š Key Changes

  • New .github/workflows/ultralytics-actions.yml file created.
  • Workflow triggers on push to main branch and on PR activities such as open, close, synchronize, or when a review is requested.
  • New job named format that runs on the latest Ubuntu version.
  • The format job utilizes a custom Ultralytics GitHub Action.
  • Action requires access to a GitHub token and Azure API keys for summary feature.

🎯 Purpose & Impact

  • πŸ’‘ Purpose: This automation is intended to ensure codebase consistency and provide automated summaries to pull requests, improving code quality and collaboration efficiency.
  • πŸ› οΈ Impact: Developers will experience streamlined code formatting, and reviewers get automatic summaries, likely leading to faster and more thorough PR reviews. Non-expert users can better understand the changes without having to dive into technical details.

@fcakyon fcakyon force-pushed the add-ultralytics-github-action branch from beeedcd to d9c5d32 Compare January 23, 2024 23:25
Copy link
Collaborator

@fcakyon fcakyon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

.

@SeeknnDestroy SeeknnDestroy merged commit c369a03 into main Jan 24, 2024
25 of 26 checks passed
@SeeknnDestroy SeeknnDestroy deleted the add-ultralytics-github-action branch January 24, 2024 15:32
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants