From b34261b12819bce121d4eac062d10c459928aa05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bruce Becker Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 16:48:57 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Prepare for v0.0.3 1. Close #2 1. Close #6 1. Move community pilot section to engagement 1. fix spelling mistakes --- D2.3-UF.md | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) diff --git a/D2.3-UF.md b/D2.3-UF.md index 2cd8778..abef6b2 100644 --- a/D2.3-UF.md +++ b/D2.3-UF.md @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ This document is a deliverable of the Sci-GaIA project, which has received fundi 4. [The forum as part of Sci-GaIA's engagement strategy](#the-forum-as-part-of-sci-gaias-engagement-strategy) 1. [The forum as means to drive identity federations](#the-forum-as-means-to-drive-identity-federations) 2. [Online Engagement at Offline Events](#online-engagement-at-offline-events) + 3. [Community pilot role](#community-pilot-role) 5. [The user forum in numbers and figures](#the-user-forum-in-numbers-and-figures) 1. [Users](#users) 1. [User Acquisition](#user-acquisition) @@ -72,9 +73,7 @@ This document is a deliverable of the Sci-GaIA project, which has received fundi 7. [Novel uses of the forum](#novel-uses-of-the-forum) 1. [Discussion site for online learning](#discussion-site-for-online-learning) 2. [Questions and Answers](#questions-and-answers) - 3. [As part of the Open Science Platform](#as-part-of-the-open-science-platform) - 4. [Community pilot](#community-pilot) - 5. [Comments engine for the website and blogs](#comments-engine-for-the-website-and-blogs) + 3. [Comments engine for the website and blogs](#comments-engine-for-the-website-and-blogs) 8. [Conclusion and Recommendations](#conclusion-and-recommendations) 1. [Recommendations to other initiatives](#recommendations-to-other-initiatives) 2. [Sustainability of the forum](#sustainability-of-the-forum) @@ -135,17 +134,14 @@ The web offers a very rich choice of means for cultivating communities, both "op Their adoption rates speak for themselves. Often communities are enticed by "walled gardens" - platforms which provide closed, configurable environments which can be customised towards any particular end-use. Examples of these would be creating a Facebook group, a Slack instance, or a private Sub-Reddit. -The "Free Code Camp" for example is a worldwide community of students of all levels interested in developing non-profit start-ups, and uses a series of Facebook groups for organising their local camps. Slack has seen immense adoption, as has WhatsApp, however, these do not leave a lasting record on the open web. - -Arguably the best two platforms on the web for engaging around specific topics or technologies are Reddit and Stack Exchange. -Reddit has roughly - -active technical communities (Sub-Reddit). - -Stack Exchange is the technical question and answer site par-excellence on the web, with over - specific sites. The most relevant ones for us had active users - as follows : - +The "Free Code Camp"^[Free Code Camp provides many services similar to Sci-GaIA, such as online learning, community support and mentorship. See http://freecodecamp.com] for example is a worldwide community of students of all levels interested in developing non-profit start-ups, and uses a series of Facebook groups for organising their local camps. +Slack has seen immense adoption, as has WhatsApp, however, these do not leave a lasting record on the open web^[We discuss how these tools can nevertheless be used in [Section 4.3](#community-pilot-role)] + +Arguably the best two platforms on the open web for engaging around specific topics or technologies are Reddit and Stack Exchange. +Perhaps a possible strategy could be to co-opt one of these platforms ? +For example [`/r/open_science`](https://www.reddit.com/r/Open_Science/) - moderated by members of [ScienceOpen](https://www.scienceopen.org)^[ScienceOpen is a freely accessible research network to discover and evaluate scientific information.] has 1 269 subscribers^[These numbers were obtained at the time of submission and are subject to volatility. Historical metrics are available at [redditmetrics.com/r/openscience](http://redditmetrics.com/r/openscience) ], and has been active since 2009. + +[Stack Exchange](https://stackexchange.com) is the technical Q&A site par-excellence on the web, with over 160 specific sites dedicated to focussed communities^[At the time of writing, the figure was 166. New sites migrate out of the Area51 incubation phase periodically. For See [stackexchange.com/sites](https://stackexchange.com/sites)]. The most relevant ones for us had active users as follows : | Site | Questions | Active Users | | :------------- | :------------- | :-----------------------| @@ -156,9 +152,10 @@ Stack Exchange is the technical question and answer site par-excellence on the w It would have been very tempting to simply start a Sub-Reddit, or use a tag on Stack Exchange to provide the Sci-GaIA User Forum. The algorithms which power these services have evolved over years and via the interactions of hundreds of millions of users to be as efficient as possible in guiding desired community interaction and user behaviour, as well as to surface quality, relevant information whilst diminish the background noise. +Perhaps the most compelling attraction is the _longevity_ of these services, which are almost guaranteed to live past the end of the Sci-GaIA project. + However, in the final analysis, they _do not provide the service required_. We needed a service over which we could maintain control and agility, putting it to work to serve the specific purposes of the communities we identified, in the time-line allowed by the project. - We discuss these parameters in the following section. ## Design Criteria @@ -242,6 +239,21 @@ In the real world, many users did not have access to local identity providers, b +## Community pilot role + +Much discussion and chatter takes place in private communication, ever more so given the rise of community chat rooms. +The most pervasive of these is [Slack](http://www.slack.com) - a chat service based on IRC, made all the more powerful through an API allowing integration of almost arbitrary tools. +The ease with which virtual control rooms can be created in Slack, integrating the suite of tools used by any particular community, makes it an irresistible tool. +The downside of such tools, however, is that they tend to pull users' data and interactions into a closed environment, which is detrimental to the commons. +A kind of "tiered" communication model would be desirable, where fast, immediate interaction is had in a slack channel, addressing specific, pressing topics, whilst _discussion_ is gently nudged off into the forum. +Typically this kind of community policy takes shape slowly, and on a case-by-case basis, depending on the community. +Sci-GaIA and AAROC have promoted the policy of gently guiding such discussion towards the forum, and out of private communications. +This usually takes the role of a "pilot" discussion, guiding the discussion until it is felt that a public exchange is appropriate^[Almost always the particular issue - which felt very personal to those involved - had wider ramifications.] Whether it was researchers asking for help and support, or issues of policy, or technical matters, the community pilot's job was to attempt to re-frame the issue in a general way, and encourage posting it as a topic of discussion to the forum. +We have recently implemented an automated version of this, whereby a bot monitors certain channels for lengthy discussions, and automatically opens a topic for discussion around that topic on the forum, asking those involved to move their discussion. +The general principle is : +> If something is worth discussing, it's worth discussion in the open + + # The user forum in numbers and figures In this section, we summarise the impact of the forum with a few representative metrics. @@ -253,25 +265,11 @@ In this section, we summarise the impact of the forum with a few representative | Discussion Topics | 652 | | Posts | 3.1k | - - ## Users At the time of writing, the forum has **221** user accounts registered - more than double the initial KPI specified by the project proposal. These users have been registered cumulatively over time. + ### User Acquisition @@ -297,9 +295,10 @@ This was done for two reasons : ![User provenance over the course of the project (April 2015 - May 2017)](images/GA-Users-geo-cities.png){#fig:3 width=16cm} - - -We can surmise from the image that the main sources of our users are +We can surmise from the image that the main sources of community members is from West, Southern and Eastern Africa. +Good correspondence can be seen between the cities where Sci-GaIA has held events (Lagos, Maputo, Pretoria, Cape Town, Nairobi, Dar es-Salaam, Addis Ababa). +The two large sources in Scandinavia correspond to Stockholm and Oslo respectively, which were the locations of the main partners in some of the supported communities in Sci-GaIA : the TTA, iGRID, MURIA, and WIMEA-ICT. +Here we can see the strong use of the forum by these communities. ## Trust levels and community leaders @@ -317,10 +316,7 @@ Contributions can come in many forms, such as * translating topics * sharing topics created by others on social networks in order to increase visibility, _etc_. -As we discuss later, these contributions are recognised by specific badges, but taken in their entirety, they the platform to identify active members and reward their contributions appropriately. Table - -summarises the requirements for ascending trust levels. - +As we discuss later, these contributions are recognised by specific badges, but taken in their entirety, they the platform to identify active members and reward their contributions appropriately. 1. **Trust Level 1 : Users can send private messages.** This level allows users to use the internal messaging system of the forum, and promotes them for engaging rather than just reading. This is unlocked after users have 1. started 5 topics and @@ -419,23 +415,6 @@ Visitors to a topic can quickly determine if it relates to their issue or questi The ability to mark topics as questions is available to all Level 1 users, however only users of trust level 2 are able to mark posts as solutions, providing a level of quality to these solutions. This facility marks another difference between the African e-Infrastructure discussion forum and similar mailing lists. -## As part of the Open Science Platform - - - -## Community pilot - -Much discussion and chatter takes place in private communication, ever more so given the rise of community chat rooms. -The most pervasive of these is [Slack](http://www.slack.com) - a chat service based on IRC, made all the more powerful through an API allowing integration of almost arbitrary tools. -The ease with which virtual control rooms can be created in Slack, integrating the suite of tools used by any particular community, makes it an irresistible tool. -The downside of such tools, however, is that they tend to pull users' data and interactions into a closed environment, which is detrimental to the commons. -A kind of "tiered" communication model would be desirable, where fast, immediate interaction is had in a slack channel, addressing specific, pressing topics, whilst _discussion_ is gently nudged off into the forum. -Typically this kind of community policy takes shape slowly, and on a case-by-case basis, depending on the community. -Sci-GaIA and AAROC have promoted the policy of gently guiding such discussion towards the forum, and out of private communications. -This usually takes the role of a "pilot" discussion, guiding the discussion until it is felt that a public exchange is appropriate^[Almost always the particular issue - which felt very personal to those involved - had wider ramifications.] Whether it was researchers asking for help and support, or issues of policy, or technical matters, the community pilot's job was to attempt to re-frame the issue in a general way, and encourage posting it as a topic of discussion to the forum. -We have recently implemented an automated version of this, whereby a bot monitors certain channels for lengthy discussions, and automatically opens a topic for discussion around that topic on the forum, asking those involved to move their discussion. -The general principle is : -> If something is worth discussing, it's worth discussion in the open @@ -460,6 +439,7 @@ At the end of the project, the experience of developing the forum and gathering The adaptability of the forum as a student support and feedback service, and later as a technical discussion site, promotes the formation of enduring relationships. Students supported in the winter school, and later participants in the e-Research Hackfest and Bootcamps could better collaborate with their own peers in research communities, including those directly supported by Sci-GaIA in WP2. The use of the forum as a comments engine on the website supported the work of dissemination in WP4. + The metrics shown in [Section X](#the-user-forum-in-numbers-and-figures) 1. **The forum is a powerful driver of identity federations** The choice to allow authentication exclusively via identity federation was an unusual one.