 |
Previous season 2 |
Current season: 3 |
Next season 4 |
|
|---|
This is an oveview of the third season (30 days, day 61-90) of using this tool (until the Personal Access Token expires) this season may last longer, as the access token couldn't be renewed on 2022 August 10th/11th.
This season starts with 2022, Thursday, August 11th. It will last more than 30 days, as the generation of images didn't start until 2022, Friday, August 26th
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the Season 3 notes section
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the 2022 August section
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 August 11th
2022 August 11th
My GitHub account was still suspended today (day 24, or 3 weeks, 3 days) so the process couldn't run. That is the least of my problems, this has caused me an unimaginable amount of stress and fear for several days now, but has been calm since. I am still extremely disappointed and a bit frustrated each day I log on to find that I am still flagged. I recently got a response, but now I had to do the hard thing and delete all my organizations, a huge disappointment to me, and the most painful thing this year. Once this is done, the next appeal will likely go through.
Unfortunately, another fork got thrown in the road, GitHub is refusing to delete my organizations, and also is refusing to let me delete my organizations. There is probably some sneaky workaround, but I am completely stumped now. Update: they unlocked the fork option after my request was rejected. Yesterday, I deleted 140 organizations (14%) on 2022, August 5th, I deleted another 80 (totaling 22% deleted) on 2022 August 6th, and another 60 (totaling 28% deleted) on 2022 August 7th. it is going to take me at least a week to delete all of them. I expect to be done by 2022, Tuesday, August 16th, but I likely won't have my account back on the same day.
I am starting to fear that I won't have my account back by 2022, August 10th, and that the access token will expire before I can renew it. On 2022, August 2nd, it reached the point where an entire half of the season does not have data, as my account was flagged.
Today, the fear came true. Season 2 has ended, with no data for 23 days out of 30 (76.66% of the time) I am unsure how renewal will work. Season 3 has started today, but currently contains no data.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 August 12th
2022 August 12th
My GitHub account was still suspended today (day 25, or 3 weeks, 4 days) so the process couldn't run. That is the least of my problems, this has caused me an unimaginable amount of stress and fear for several days now, but has been calm since. I am still extremely disappointed and a bit frustrated each day I log on to find that I am still flagged. I recently got a response, but now I had to do the hard thing and delete all my organizations, a huge disappointment to me, and the most painful thing this year. Once this is done, the next appeal will likely go through.
Unfortunately, another fork got thrown in the road, GitHub is refusing to delete my organizations, and also is refusing to let me delete my organizations. There is probably some sneaky workaround, but I am completely stumped now. Update: they unlocked the fork option after my request was rejected. Yesterday, I deleted 140 organizations (14%) on 2022, August 5th, I deleted another 80 (totaling 22% deleted) on 2022 August 6th, and another 60 (totaling 28% deleted) on 2022 August 7th. it is going to take me at least a week to delete all of them. I expect to be done by 2022, Tuesday, August 16th, but I likely won't have my account back on the same day.
I am starting to fear that I won't have my account back by 2022, August 10th, and that the access token will expire before I can renew it. On 2022, August 2nd, it reached the point where an entire half of the season does not have data, as my account was flagged.
Today, the fear came true. Season 2 has ended, with no data for 23 days out of 30 (76.66% of the time) I am unsure how renewal will work. Season 3 has started yesterday, but currently contains no data.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 August 13th
2022 August 13th
My GitHub account was still suspended today (day 26, or 3 weeks, 5 days) so the process couldn't run. That is the least of my problems, this has caused me an unimaginable amount of stress and fear for several days now, but has been calm since. I am still extremely disappointed and a bit frustrated each day I log on to find that I am still flagged. I recently got a response, but now I had to do the hard thing and delete all my organizations, a huge disappointment to me, and the most painful thing this year. Once this is done, the next appeal will likely go through.
I am still deleting organizations, and I likely won't have my account back the same day I delete the last one, so image generation won't be resuming for at least 3 days. Season 3 currently contains no data due to this.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 August 14th
2022 August 14th
My GitHub account was still suspended today (day 27, or 3 weeks, 6 days) so the process couldn't run. That is the least of my problems, this has caused me an unimaginable amount of stress and fear for several days now, but has been calm since. I am still extremely disappointed and a bit frustrated each day I log on to find that I am still flagged. I recently got a response, but now I had to do the hard thing and delete all my organizations, a huge disappointment to me, and the most painful thing this year. Once this is done, the next appeal will likely go through.
I am still deleting organizations, and I likely won't have my account back the same day I delete the last one, so image generation won't be resuming for at least 2 days. I expect to finish deleting organizations on 2022, Tuesday, August 16th. Season 3 currently contains no data due to this.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 August 15th
2022 August 15th
My GitHub account was still suspended today (day 28, or 4 weeks, 0 days) so the process couldn't run. That is the least of my problems, this has caused me an unimaginable amount of stress and fear for several days now, but has been calm since. I am still extremely disappointed and a bit frustrated each day I log on to find that I am still flagged. I recently got a response, but now I had to do the hard thing and delete all my organizations, a huge disappointment to me, and the most painful thing this year. Once this is done, the next appeal will likely go through.
I am still deleting organizations, and I likely won't have my account back the same day I delete the last one tomorrow, so image generation won't be resuming for at least 2 days. I expect to finish deleting organizations on 2022, Tuesday, August 16th (tomorrow) Season 3 currently contains no data due to this.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 August 16th
2022 August 16th
My GitHub account was still suspended today (day 29, or 4 weeks, 1 day) so the process couldn't run. That is the least of my problems, this has caused me an unimaginable amount of stress and fear for several days now, but has been calm since. I am still extremely disappointed and a bit frustrated each day I log on to find that I am still flagged. I recently got a response, but now I had to do the hard thing and delete all my organizations, a huge disappointment to me, and the most painful thing this year. Once this is done, the next appeal will likely go through.
I finished deleting organizations today, but I likely won't have my account back today. I am currently deciding what to do next. Season 3 currently contains no data due to this.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 August 17th
2022 August 17th
My GitHub account was still suspended today (day 30, or 4 weeks, 2 days) so the process couldn't run. That is the least of my problems, this has caused me an unimaginable amount of stress and fear for several days now, but has been calm since. I am still extremely disappointed and a bit frustrated each day I log on to find that I am still flagged. I recently got a response, but now I had to do the hard thing and delete all my organizations, a huge disappointment to me, and the most painful thing this year. Once this is done, the next appeal will likely go through.
I finished deleting all of my organizations yesterday, I am waiting for my family to come back (2022, Thursday, August 18th) to decide the next step. Season 3 currently contains no data due to this.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 August 18th
2022 August 18th
My GitHub account was still suspended today (day 31, or 4 weeks, 3 days) so the process couldn't run. That is the least of my problems, this has caused me an unimaginable amount of stress and fear for several days now, but has been calm since. I am still extremely disappointed and a bit frustrated each day I log on to find that I am still flagged. I recently got a response, but now I had to do the hard thing and delete all my organizations, a huge disappointment to me, and the most painful thing this year. Once this is done, the next appeal will likely go through.
I finished deleting all of my organizations yesterday, I am waiting to start the next step. Season 3 cannot start yet due to this.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 August 19th
2022 August 19th
My GitHub account was still suspended today (day 32, or 4 weeks, 4 days) so the process couldn't run. That is the least of my problems, this has caused me an unimaginable amount of stress and fear for several days now, but has been calm since. I am still extremely disappointed and a bit frustrated each day I log on to find that I am still flagged. I recently got a response, but now I had to do the hard thing and delete all my organizations, a huge disappointment to me, and the most painful thing this year. Once this is done, the next appeal will likely go through.
I finished deleting all of my organizations a few days ago, I am waiting to start the next step. Season 3 cannot start yet due to this.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 August 20th
2022 August 20th
My GitHub account was still suspended today (day 33, or 4 weeks, 5 days) so the process couldn't run. That is the least of my problems, this has caused me an unimaginable amount of stress and fear for several days now, but has been calm since. I am still extremely disappointed and a bit frustrated each day I log on to find that I am still flagged. I recently got a response, but now I had to do the hard thing and delete all my organizations, a huge disappointment to me, and the most painful thing this year. Once this is done, the next appeal will likely go through.
I finished deleting all of my organizations on 2022, Wednesday, August 17th, I sent an appeal last night, and am still awaiting a response. Season 3 cannot start yet due to this.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 August 21st
2022 August 21st
My GitHub account was still suspended today (day 34, or 4 weeks, 6 days) so the process couldn't run. That is the least of my problems, this has caused me an unimaginable amount of stress and fear for several days now, but has been calm since. I am still extremely disappointed and a bit frustrated each day I log on to find that I am still flagged. I recently got a response, but now I had to do the hard thing and delete all my organizations, a huge disappointment to me, and the most painful thing this year. Once this is done, the next appeal will likely go through.
I finished deleting all of my organizations on 2022, Wednesday, August 17th, I sent an appeal on 2022, Friday, August 19th, and am still awaiting a response. Season 3 cannot start yet due to this.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 August 22nd
2022 August 22nd
My GitHub account was still suspended today (day 35, or 5 weeks, 0 days) so the process couldn't run. That is the least of my problems, this has caused me an unimaginable amount of stress and fear for several days now, but has been calm since. I am still extremely disappointed and a bit frustrated each day I log on to find that I am still flagged. I recently got a response, but now I had to do the hard thing and delete all my organizations, a huge disappointment to me, and the most painful thing this year. Once this is done, the next appeal will likely go through.
I finished deleting all of my organizations on 2022, Wednesday, August 17th, I sent an appeal on 2022, Friday, August 19th, and am still awaiting a response. Season 3 cannot start yet due to this.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 August 23rd
2022 August 23rd
My GitHub account was still suspended today (day 36, or 5 weeks, 1 day) so the process couldn't run. That is the least of my problems, this has caused me an unimaginable amount of stress and fear for several days now, but has been calm since. I am still extremely disappointed and a bit frustrated each day I log on to find that I am still flagged. I recently got a response, but now I had to do the hard thing and delete all my organizations, a huge disappointment to me, and the most painful thing this year. Once this is done, the next appeal will likely go through.
I finished deleting all of my organizations on 2022, Wednesday, August 17th, I sent an appeal on 2022, Friday, August 19th, and am still awaiting a response. Season 3 cannot start yet due to this.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 August 24th
2022 August 24th
My GitHub account was still suspended today (day 37, or 5 weeks, 2 days) so the process couldn't run. That is the least of my problems, this has caused me an unimaginable amount of stress and fear for several days now, but has been calm since. I am still extremely disappointed and a bit frustrated each day I log on to find that I am still flagged. I recently got a response, but now I had to do the hard thing and delete all my organizations, a huge disappointment to me, and the most painful thing this year. Once this is done, the next appeal will likely go through.
I finished deleting all of my organizations on 2022, Wednesday, August 17th, I sent an appeal on 2022, Friday, August 19th, and am still awaiting a response. Season 3 cannot start yet due to this.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 August 25th
2022 August 25th
My GitHub account was still suspended today (day 38, or 5 weeks, 3 days) so the process couldn't run. That is the least of my problems, this has caused me an unimaginable amount of stress and fear for several days now, but has been calm since. I am still extremely disappointed and a bit frustrated each day I log on to find that I am still flagged. I recently got a response, but now I had to do the hard thing and delete all my organizations, a huge disappointment to me, and the most painful thing this year. Once this is done, the next appeal will likely go through.
I finished deleting all of my organizations on 2022, Wednesday, August 17th, I sent an appeal on 2022, Friday, August 19th, and am still awaiting a response as of 2022, Thursday, August 25th. Season 3 cannot start yet due to this.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 August 26th
2022 August 26th
The process ran successfully today, running for the first time since my account suspension on July 19th, as my account was finally fully restored today. The process also ran in full, taking 2 hours to complete. I had to run the process manually today.
I put the workflow runs into 5 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R0800- Partial success, with 800 out of 1500+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R0900- Partial success, with 900 out of 1500+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1000- Moderate success, with 1000 out of 1500+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 4 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
For this repository, I am now including error dumps in Python traceback format (*.pytb) which will still be viewable as plain text through README.pytb files.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 August 27th
2022 August 27th
The process ran successfully today, running for a second consecutive day. It took 1 hour and 46 minutes to generate images, but took additional time to clean up orphan processes after the images had been pushed to the repository. I ran the process manually today, but it started on its own less than an hour later, and I canceled the second daily run after it ran for over an hour.
I put the workflow runs into 5 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R0800- Partial success, with 800 out of 1500+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R0900- Partial success, with 900 out of 1500+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1000- Moderate success, with 1000 out of 1500+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 4 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
For this repository, I am now including error dumps in Python traceback format (*.pytb) which will still be viewable as plain text through README.pytb files.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 August 28th
2022 August 28th
The process ran successfully today, running for a third consecutive day. It took less than 1 hour and 25 minutes to generate images. It did a really bad job, collecting less than 40% of the data needed. I have never seen the results so bad before.
I put the workflow runs into 5 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run or failed to run - Category 1:
R1200- Partial success, with 800 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1300- Partial success, with 900 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1400- Moderate success, with 1000 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 1 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
For this repository, I am now including error dumps in Python traceback format (*.pytb) which will still be viewable as plain text through README.pytb files.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 August 29th
2022 August 29th
The process ran unsuccessfully today. I was hoping it could at least give somewhat improved results over yesterday, but it crashed in 58 seconds.
I put the workflow runs into 5 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1200- Partial success, with 800 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1300- Partial success, with 900 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1400- Moderate success, with 1000 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 0 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
For this repository, I am now including error dumps in Python traceback format (*.pytb) which will still be viewable as plain text through README.pytb files.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 August 30th
2022 August 30th
The process ran successfully today, unlike yesterday, and the day before. Results were given in full, in 1 hour and 40 minutes (shorter than the usual 2+ hours it takes for this)
I put the workflow runs into 5 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R0800- Partial success, with 800 out of 1500+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R0900- Partial success, with 900 out of 1500+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1000- Moderate success, with 1000 out of 1500+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 4 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
For this repository, I am now including error dumps in Python traceback format (*.pytb) which will still be viewable as plain text through README.pytb files.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 August 31s
2022 August 31st
The process ran successfully today, running for a second consecutive day. It took less than 1 hour and 22 minutes to generate images. It did a really bad job, collecting less than 40% of the data needed. Language data was better than 2022, August 28th, but the overview was just as bad as 2022 August 28th.
I put the workflow runs into 5 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1200- Partial success, with 800 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1300- Partial success, with 900 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1400- Moderate success, with 1000 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 1 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
For this repository, I am now including error dumps in Python traceback format (*.pytb) which will still be viewable as plain text through README.pytb files.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the 2022 September section
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 1st
2022 September 1st
The process ran successfully today, unlike yesterday. Results were given in full, in 1 hour and 48 minutes (shorter than the usual 2+ hours it takes for this)
I put the workflow runs into 5 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R0800- Partial success, with 800 out of 1500+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R0900- Partial success, with 900 out of 1500+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1000- Moderate success, with 1000 out of 1500+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 4 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
For this repository, I am now including error dumps in Python traceback format (*.pytb) which will still be viewable as plain text through README.pytb files.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 2nd
2022 September 2nd
The process ran successfully today, results were given in full, in 1 hour and 50 minutes (shorter than the usual 2+ hours it takes for this)
The images were pushed to the repository, but it took an extra 2 minutes to clean up orphan processes.
I put the workflow runs into 5 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R0800- Partial success, with 800 out of 1500+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R0900- Partial success, with 900 out of 1500+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1000- Moderate success, with 1000 out of 1500+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 4 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
For this repository, I am now including error dumps in Python traceback format (*.pytb) which will still be viewable as plain text through README.pytb files.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 3rd
2022 September 3rd
The process ran unsuccessfully today. It activated a bit earlier than expected, and I was still working, which may have caused it to fail in 60 seconds. I considered re-running it, but decided not to.
I put the workflow runs into 5 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1200- Partial success, with 800 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1300- Partial success, with 900 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1400- Moderate success, with 1000 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 0 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
For this repository, I am now including error dumps in Python traceback format (*.pytb) which will still be viewable as plain text through README.pytb files.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 4th
2022 September 4th
The process somewhat successfully today. It ran, and finished in 1 hour and 29 minutes, but gave really bad results.
I put the workflow runs into 5 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1200- Partial success, with 800 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1300- Partial success, with 900 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1400- Moderate success, with 1000 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 1 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
For this repository, I am now including error dumps in Python traceback format (*.pytb) which will still be viewable as plain text through README.pytb files.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 5th
2022 September 5th
The process somewhat successfully today. It ran, and finished in 1 hour and 27 minutes + 45 seconds, but gave really bad results (worse than yesterday) the process started at the latest point in the day that it has ever started, starting at 8:05 pm.
I now put the workflow runs into 6 categories (as of yesterday, it was only 5):
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1100- Partial success, with 1100-1199 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1200- Partial success, with 1200-1299 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1300- Partial success, with 1300-1399 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
R1400- Moderate success, with 1400-1650 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 5:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 1 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
For this repository, I am now including error dumps in Python traceback format (*.pytb) which will still be viewable as plain text through README.pytb files.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 6th
2022 September 6th
The process ran unsuccessfully today. I thought it was going to go well, but it failed after 1 hour and 48 minutes. It was really disappointing.
I put the workflow runs into 7 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1100- Partial success, with 1100-1199 or less out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1200- Partial success, with 1200-1299 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1300- Partial success, with 1300-1399 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
R1400- Partial success, with 1400-1499 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 5:
R1500- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 6:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 0 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
For this repository, I am now including error dumps in Python traceback format (*.pytb) which will still be viewable as plain text through README.pytb files.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 7th
2022 September 7th
The process ran somewhat successfully today. It managed to successfully run today in 1 hour 30 minutes and 52 seconds, but didn't give full results. The results were still better than that of a couple days ago (2022, September 5th) and it was better than wasting 1 hour and 48 minutes only to give an error.
I put the workflow runs into 7 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1100- Partial success, with 1100-1199 or less out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1200- Partial success, with 1200-1299 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1300- Partial success, with 1300-1399 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
R1400- Partial success, with 1400-1499 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 5:
R1500- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 6:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 1 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
For this repository, I am now including error dumps in Python traceback format (*.pytb) which will still be viewable as plain text through README.pytb files.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 8th
2022 September 8th
The process ran successfully today, although this time, something weird happened: it took 3 hours 29 minutes and 18 seconds to run. I thought there was a glitch, there might have been. I was expecting the results to be doubled or something, but it returned perfectly normal results. Unfortunately, I couldn't log the details today, as it was nearly 11:30 pm by the time it finished, and I had no more available GitHub development time today.
I put the workflow runs into 7 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1100- Partial success, with 1100-1199 or less out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1200- Partial success, with 1200-1299 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1300- Partial success, with 1300-1399 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
R1400- Partial success, with 1400-1499 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 5:
R1500- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 6:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 6 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
For this repository, I am now including error dumps in Python traceback format (*.pytb) which will still be viewable as plain text through README.pytb files.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 9th
2022 September 9th
The process ran somewhat successfully today. Yesterday, I accidentally wrote notes without disabling the workflow first, I caught myself, and canceled the 2 runs. Today, the process ran for 1 hour, 52 minutes,and 46 seconds, but still gave very poor results. Normally, it only gives poor results if it finishes in under an hour and a half.
I put the workflow runs into 7 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1100- Partial success, with 1100-1199 or less out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1200- Partial success, with 1200-1299 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1300- Partial success, with 1300-1399 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
R1400- Partial success, with 1400-1499 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 5:
R1500- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 6:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 1 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
For this repository, I am now including error dumps in Python traceback format (*.pytb) which will still be viewable as plain text through README.pytb files.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 10th
2022 September 10th
The process ran successfully today, although this time, it took a very long time to run again (2 hours 57 minutes and 25 seconds)
I put the workflow runs into 7 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1100- Partial success, with 1100-1199 or less out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1200- Partial success, with 1200-1299 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1300- Partial success, with 1300-1399 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
R1400- Partial success, with 1400-1499 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 5:
R1500- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 6:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 6 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
For this repository, I am now including error dumps in Python traceback format (*.pytb) which will still be viewable as plain text through README.pytb files.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 11th
2022 September 11th
The process ran successfully today, although this time, it took a very long time to run again (2 hours 49 minutes and 18 seconds) the results were successful, and highly accurate.
Today would have been the first day of season 4, but a surplus was created due to a delay when my GitHUb account got flagged 2 months ago. The current season will last 14 more das.
I put the workflow runs into 7 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1100- Partial success, with 1100-1199 or less out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1200- Partial success, with 1200-1299 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1300- Partial success, with 1300-1399 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
R1400- Partial success, with 1400-1499 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 5:
R1500- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 6:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 6 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
For this repository, I am now including error dumps in Python traceback format (*.pytb) which will still be viewable as plain text through README.pytb files.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 12th
2022 September 12th
The process ran unsuccessfully today. It gave an error repeatedly today that I have never seen to date (aiohttp errors) and produced an error log nearly 6x longer than normal (over 12000 lines)) it failed in 2 hours, 0 minutes, and 59 seconds. I also thought to myself that there is an easier way to get error logs than to get the whole page to load into memory, strike CTRL + A, CTRL + C then edit out the non-log parts. Turns out, you can just download the entire workflow run.
I put the workflow runs into 7 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1100- Partial success, with 1100-1199 or less out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1200- Partial success, with 1200-1299 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1300- Partial success, with 1300-1399 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
R1400- Partial success, with 1400-1499 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 5:
R1500- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 6:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 0 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
For this repository, I am now including error dumps in Python traceback format (*.pytb) which will still be viewable as plain text through README.pytb files.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 13th
2022 September 13th
The process ran unsuccessfully again today. It gave the aiohttp error again, but failed much faster, it failed in just 1 minute and 44 seconds. It feels like something broke, and that this may not be an easy fix, or a fix that involves self recoveyr.
I put the workflow runs into 7 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1100- Partial success, with 1100-1199 or less out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1200- Partial success, with 1200-1299 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1300- Partial success, with 1300-1399 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
R1400- Partial success, with 1400-1499 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 5:
R1500- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 6:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 0 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
For this repository, I am now including error dumps in Python traceback format (*.pytb) which will still be viewable as plain text through README.pytb files.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 14th
2022 September 14th
The process ran unsuccessfully yet again today. It gave the aiohttp error again, but took 1 hour, 50 minutes, and 9 seconds to fail. It feels like something broke, and that this may not be an easy fix, or a fix that involves self recovery.
I put the workflow runs into 7 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1100- Partial success, with 1100-1199 or less out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1200- Partial success, with 1200-1299 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1300- Partial success, with 1300-1399 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
R1400- Partial success, with 1400-1499 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 5:
R1500- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 6:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 0 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
For this repository, I am now including error dumps in Python traceback format (*.pytb) which will still be viewable as plain text through README.pytb files.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 15th
2022 September 15th
The process ran successfully today, after failing to run for 3 consecutive days. Although it gave poor results, I was glad it ran successfully. I was starting to think it would never run again. There were no aiohttp errors, and the process completed in 1 hour, 50 minutes, and 13 seconds.
I put the workflow runs into 7 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1100- Partial success, with 1100-1199 or less out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1200- Partial success, with 1200-1299 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1300- Partial success, with 1300-1399 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
R1400- Partial success, with 1400-1499 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 5:
R1500- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 6:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 1 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 16th
2022 September 16th
The process ran successfully today, but gave poor results. It also took 7 minutes to "clean up orphan processes" after the images were pushed to the repository. There were no aiohttp errors, and the process completed in 1 hour, 50 minutes, and 19 seconds.
I put the workflow runs into 7 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1100- Partial success, with 1100-1199 or less out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1200- Partial success, with 1200-1299 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1300- Partial success, with 1300-1399 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
R1400- Partial success, with 1400-1499 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 5:
R1500- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 6:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 1 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 17th
2022 September 17th
The process ran successfully today, but gave poor results. There were no aiohttp errors, and the process completed in 2 hourS, 0 minutes, and 23 seconds.
I put the workflow runs into 7 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1100- Partial success, with 1100-1199 or less out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1200- Partial success, with 1200-1299 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1300- Partial success, with 1300-1399 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
R1400- Partial success, with 1400-1499 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 5:
R1500- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 6:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 2 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 18th
2022 September 18th
The process ran unsuccessfully today, failing in just 1 minute and 8 seconds. I feel the cause was by me currently pushing files as the process was started, but I can't be sure that this was the cause.
I put the workflow runs into 7 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1100- Partial success, with 1100-1199 or less out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1200- Partial success, with 1200-1299 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1300- Partial success, with 1300-1399 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
R1400- Partial success, with 1400-1499 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 5:
R1500- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 6:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 0 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 19th
2022 September 19th
The process ran successfully today, but gave poor results. There were no aiohttp errors, and the process completed in 1 hours, 50 minutes, and 26 seconds. It is slowly climbing back up to normal (1000, 1100, 1200, 1300 repositories scanned)
I put the workflow runs into 7 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1100- Partial success, with 1100-1199 or less out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1200- Partial success, with 1200-1299 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1300- Partial success, with 1300-1399 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
R1400- Partial success, with 1400-1499 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 5:
R1500- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 6:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 3 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 20th
2022 September 20th
The process ran successfully today, but gave very poor results. There were no aiohttp errors, and the process completed in 1 hours, 26 minutes, and 4 seconds. I am noticing a significant increase in repository views over the past few days, even out of smaller sample sizes. I am not sure where all this traffic is coming from.
I put the workflow runs into 7 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1100- Partial success, with 1100-1199 or less out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1200- Partial success, with 1200-1299 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1300- Partial success, with 1300-1399 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
R1400- Partial success, with 1400-1499 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 5:
R1500- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 6:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 1 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 21st
2022 September 21st
The process ran successfully today, but gave incomplete results. It nearly scanned all of my repositories, but fell short ~>100 repositories. There were no aiohttp errors, and the process completed in 2 hours, 40 minutes, and 10 seconds. I am noticing a significant increase in repository views over the past few days, even out of smaller sample sizes. I am not sure where all this traffic is coming from. The process additionally took 6 minutes to clean up orphan processes.
I put the workflow runs into 9 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1100- Partial success, with 1100-1199 or less out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1200- Partial success, with 1200-1299 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1300- Partial success, with 1300-1399 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
R1400- Partial success, with 1400-1499 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 5:
R1500- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 6:
R1600- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 7:
R1700- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 8:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 7 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 22nd
2022 September 22nd
The process ran unsuccessfully today, failing within 1 minute and 1 second. There were no aiohttp errors, and I was not active for at least 20 minutes before the workflow ran.
I put the workflow runs into 9 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1100- Partial success, with 1100-1199 or less out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1200- Partial success, with 1200-1299 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1300- Partial success, with 1300-1399 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
R1400- Partial success, with 1400-1499 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 5:
R1500- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 6:
R1600- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 7:
R1700- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 8:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 0 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 23rd
2022 September 23rd
The process ran successfully today, giving full results for the first time in a while. The process finished in 2 hours, 43 minutes, and 19 seconds. There is a signifcant amount of traffic to my repositories, I can't tell if it is mostly myself, or mostly other users (or both) there were no aiohttp errors today.
I put the workflow runs into 9 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1100- Partial success, with 1100-1199 or less out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1200- Partial success, with 1200-1299 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1300- Partial success, with 1300-1399 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
R1400- Partial success, with 1400-1499 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 5:
R1500- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 6:
R1600- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 7:
R1700- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 8:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 8 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 24th
2022 September 24th
The process ran successfully today, although it gave incomplete results .The process finished in 1 hours, 58 minutes, and 8 seconds. There is a signifcant amount of traffic to my repositories, I can't tell if it is mostly myself, or mostly other users (or both) there were no aiohttp errors today.
I put the workflow runs into 9 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1100- Partial success, with 1100-1199 or less out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1200- Partial success, with 1200-1299 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1300- Partial success, with 1300-1399 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
R1400- Partial success, with 1400-1499 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 5:
R1500- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 6:
R1600- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 7:
R1700- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 8:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 1 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the entry for 2022 September 25th
2022 September 25th
The process ran unsuccessfully today, although it gave incomplete results. The process finished in 21 seconds, and gave empty data. The access token expired a day earlier than expected, and I had to renew it today. This will be the data for today.
I put the workflow runs into 9 categories:
- Category 0:
Complete failure- The process did not run - Category 1:
R1100- Partial success, with 1100-1199 or less out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 2:
R1200- Partial success, with 1200-1299 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 3:
R1300- Partial success, with 1300-1399 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 4:
R1400- Partial success, with 1400-1499 out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 5:
R1500- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 6:
R1600- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 7:
R1700- Moderate success, with 1500-1599 or more out of 1600+ repositories scanned/indexed - Category 8:
Complete success- The process ran and gave accurate results
Today was a category 0 day.
I made the observation that when successfully ran, only 10 languages are listed, but when it doesn't run successfully, only 15 languages are listed.
I have noted that a good way to see if it ran correctly or not is to check the overview image card. If it says No name instead of my original GitHub username (Sean P. Myrick V19.1.7.2) (not my handle, seanpm2001) then it ran incorrectly. Otherwise, it worked correctly. For personal usage, I can tell it ran worse when the counted repositories is 800 instead of 900 or 1000 additionally, if my GitHub username doesn't come up, the card puts 0 for the total commit count.
Click/tap here to expand the season 3 overview & language counts table
| Date (YYYY/MM/DD) | Overview | Languages |
|---|---|---|
| 2022, August 11th | ❌ | ❌ |
| 2022, August 12th | ❌ | ❌ |
| 2022, August 13th | ❌ | ❌ |
| 2022, August 14th | ❌ | ❌ |
| 2022, August 15th | ❌ | ❌ |
| 2022, August 16th | ❌ | ❌ |
| 2022, August 17th | ❌ | ❌ |
| 2022, August 18th | ❌ | ❌ |
| 2022, August 19th | ❌ | ❌ |
| 2022, August 20th | ❌ | ❌ |
| 2022, August 21st | ❌ | ❌ |
| 2022, August 22nd | ❌ | ❌ |
| 2022, August 23rd | ❌ | ❌ |
| 2022, August 24th | ❌ | ❌ |
| 2022, August 25th | ❌ | ❌ |
| 2022, August 26th |  |
 |
| 2022, August 27th |  |
 |
| 2022, August 28th |  |
 |
| 2022, August 29th | ❌ | ❌ |
| 2022, August 30th |  |
 |
| 2022, August 31st |  |
 |
| 2022, September 1st |  |
 |
| 2022, September 2nd |  |
 |
| 2022, September 3rd | ❌ | ❌ |
| 2022, September 4th |  |
 |
| 2022, September 5th |  |
 |
| 2022, September 6th | ❌ | ❌ |
| 2022, September 7th |  |
 |
| 2022, September 8th |  |
 |
| 2022, September 9th |  |
 |
| 2022, September 10th |  |
 |
| Surplus | Extra days added due to technical issues. | Surplus |
| 2022, September 11th |  |
 |
| 2022, September 12th | ❌ | ❌ |
| 2022, September 13th | ❌ | ❌ |
| 2022, September 14th | ❌ | ❌ |
| 2022, September 15th |  |
 |
| 2022, September 16th |  |
 |
| 2022, September 17th |  |
 |
| 2022, September 18th | ❌ | ❌ |
| 2022, September 19th |  |
 |
| 2022, September 20th |  |
 |
| 2022, September 21st |  |
 |
| 2022, September 22nd | ❌ | ❌ |
| 2022, September 23rd |  |
 |
| 2022, September 24th |  |
 |
| 2022, September 25th |  |
 |
|
Previous season 2 |
Current season: 3 |
Next season 4 |
|
|---|
The access token for this project was simply named ACCESS_TOKEN I don't have its URL on me, but I do have the configuration info for when I create a new one tomorrow (since the current one expires on 2022, Tuesday, July 12th)
You can use this as a reference for setting up the project.
The access token for this project was renewed on 2022 July 12th before 2:35 pm PST.
The access token for this project was renewed on 2022, August 26th, before 7:00 pm PST
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the file info section
File type: Markdown document (*.md *.mkd *.mdown *.markdown)
File version: 46 (2022, Wednesday, September 28th at 11:12 pm PST)
Line count (including blank lines and compiler line): 1,945
Article language: English (USA) / Markdown (CommonMark) / HTML5 (5.3)
You may need special rendering support for the <details> tag in use in this document.
Click/tap here to expand/collapse the changelog for this project
Version 1 (2022, Wednesday, August 10th at 6:01 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Started the file
- Added the title section
- Added the main table
- Separated the access token section
-
- Added the master access token section
-
- Split off to the 2022 June and 2022 July access token sections
-
- Added the 2022 August access token section
- Remodified the file for season 3
- Added the file info section
- Added the file history section
- No other changes in version 1
Version 2 (2022, Thursday, August 11th at 7:47 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 August 11th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
- No other changes in version 2
Version 3 (2022, Friday, August 12th at 5:47 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 August 12th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
- No other changes in version 3
Version 4 (2022, Saturday, August 13th at 6:00 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 August 13th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
- No other changes in version 4
Version 5 (2022, Sunday, August 14th at 5:42 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 August 14th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
- No other changes in version 5
Version 6 (2022, Monday, August 15th at 7:46 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 August 15th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
- No other changes in version 6
Version 7 (2022, Tuesday, August 16th at 3:43 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 August 16th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
- No other changes in version 7
Version 8 (2022, Wednesday, August 17th at 4:58 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 August 17th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
- No other changes in version 8
Version 9 (2022, Thursday, August 18th at 7:04 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 August 18th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
- No other changes in version 9
Version 10 (2022, Friday, August 19th at 4:24 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 August 19th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
- No other changes in version 10
Version 11 (2022, Saturday, August 20th at 5:44 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 August 20th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
- No other changes in version 11
Version 12 (2022, Sunday, August 21st at 6:09 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 August 21st
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
- No other changes in version 12
Version 13 (2022, Monday, August 22nd at 5:33 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 August 22nd
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
- No other changes in version 13
Version 14 (2022, Tuesday, August 23rd at 6:38 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 August 23rd
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
- No other changes in version 14
Version 15 (2022, Wednesday, August 24th at 7:30 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 August 24th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
- No other changes in version 15
Version 16 (2022, Thursday, August 25th at 4:10 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 August 25th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
- No other changes in version 16
Version 17 (2022, Friday, August 26th at 10:05 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 August 26th
- Updated the
Access tokenssection for 2022 August - Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
- No other changes in version 17
Version 18 (2022, Saturday, August 27th at 9:26 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 August 27th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
- No other changes in version 18
Version 19 (2022, Sunday, August 28th at 9:33 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 August 28th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
- No other changes in version 19
Version 20 (2022, Monday, August 29th at 7:50 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 August 29th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
- No other changes in version 20
Version 21 (2022, Tuesday, August 30th at 9:25 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 August 30th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
- No other changes in version 21
Version 22 (2022, Wednesday, August 31st at 9:07 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 August 31st
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
- No other changes in version 22
Version 23 (2022, Thursday, September 1st at 9:46 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 1st
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
- No other changes in version 23
Version 24 (2022, Friday, September 2nd at 10:10 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 2nd
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
-
- Added an entry for 2022, September 2nd
- No other changes in version 24
Version 25 (2022, Saturday, September 3rd at 7:33 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 3rd
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
-
- Added an entry for 2022, September 3rd
- No other changes in version 25
Version 26 (2022, Sunday, September 4th at 9:32 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 4th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
-
- Added an entry for 2022, September 4th
- No other changes in version 26
Version 27 (2022, Monday, September 5th at 9:56 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 5th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
-
- Added an entry for 2022, September 5th
- No other changes in version 27
Version 28 (2022, Tuesday, September 6th at 9:48 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 6th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
-
- Added an entry for 2022, September 6th
- No other changes in version 28
Version 29 (2022, Wednesday, September 7th at 9:06 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 7th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
-
- Added an entry for 2022, September 7th
- No other changes in version 29
Version 30 (2022, Friday, September 9th at 3:58 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 8th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
-
- Added an entry for 2022, September 9th (V30)
- No other changes in version 30
Version 31 (2022, Friday, September 9th at 10:02 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 9th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
-
- Added an entry for 2022, September 9th (V31)
- No other changes in version 31
Version 32 (2022, Saturday, September 10th at 10:59 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 10th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
-
- Added an entry for 2022, September 10th (V32)
- No other changes in version 32
Version 33 (2022, Monday, September 12th at 1:24 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 11th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
-
- Added an entry for 2022, September 11th (V33)
- No other changes in version 33
Version 34 (2022, Monday, September 12th at 10:31 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 12th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
-
- Added an entry for 2022, September 12th (V34)
- No other changes in version 34
Version 35 (2022, Tuesday, September 13th at 7:57 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 13th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
-
- Added an entry for 2022, September 13th (V35)
- No other changes in version 35
Version 36 (2022, Wednesday, September 14th at 9:09 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 14th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
-
- Added an entry for 2022, September 14th (V36)
- No other changes in version 36
Version 37 (2022, Thursday, September 15th at 10:09 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 15th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
-
- Added an entry for 2022, September 15th (V37)
- No other changes in version 37
Version 38 (2022, Friday, September 16th at 10:07 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 16th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
-
- Added an entry for 2022, September 16th (V37)
- No other changes in version 38
Version 39 (2022, Sunday, September 18th at 8:25 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 17th
- Added an entry for 2022 September 18th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
-
- Added an entry for 2022, September 18th (V39)
- No other changes in version 39
Version 40 (2022, Monday, September 19th at 10:28 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 19th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
-
- Added an entry for 2022, September 19th (V40)
- No other changes in version 40
Version 41 (2022, Tuesday, September 20th at 10:24 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 20th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
-
- Added an entry for 2022, September 20th (V41)
- No other changes in version 41
Version 42 (2022, Wednesday, September 21st at 11:10 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 21st
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
-
- Added an entry for 2022, September 21st (V42)
- No other changes in version 42
Version 43 (2022, Thursday, September 22nd at 10:48 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 22nd
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
-
- Added an entry for 2022, September 22nd (V43)
- No other changes in version 43
Version 44 (2022, Friday, September 23rd at 11:18 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 23rd
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
-
- Added an entry for 2022, September 23rd (V44)
- No other changes in version 44
Version 45 (2022, Saturday, September 24th at 10:31 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 24th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
-
- Added an entry for 2022, September 24th (V45)
- No other changes in version 45
Version 46 (2022, Wednesday, September 28th at 11:12 pm PST)
This version was made by: @seanpm2001
Note: Season 4 started a day early, and at the same, it didn't. Data was finally filled in for season 3 today, this is likely to be the final update to the season 3 document until renovations are needed. This update is coming 4 days late.
Changes:
- Updated the main table
- Added an entry for 2022 September 25th
- Updated the file info section
- Updated the file history section
-
- Added an entry for 2022, September 28th (V46)
- No other changes in version 46