Skip to content

πŸ“ƒοΈ An article on the problems with the Google Knowledge Graph, and why you should avoid the Google Search engine.

License

GPL-3.0 and 2 other licenses found

Licenses found

GPL-3.0
LICENSE.txt
GPL-3.0
LICENSE-GPL.txt
GPL-3.0
LICENSE-GPL3.txt
Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

seanpm2001/Problems-with-the-Google-Knowledge-Graph

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

Β 

History

25 Commits
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 

Problems with the Google Knowledge Graph

Click/tap here to expand/collapse this article

View main article

Click/tap here to expand/collapse the lead section of this article

Google added the Knowledge Graph on 2012, May 16th. It was intended to give a quick summary of information for searches before you dived into a long search, or went down a rabbit hole. This feature had potential, but it was not implemented correctly.

The main problems include:

Lack of source attribution

Click/tap here to expand/collapse this section

The main problem with the Knowledge Graph is the complete lack of source attribution. Information is given, but the source is most often never cited or even linked to.

Search engines like DuckDuckGo have alternatives to the Google Knowledge Graph that actually link to where the information is coming from. It is a single <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia">Wikipedia</a> tag away, come on Google, stop being so lazy!

Bias

Click/tap here to expand/collapse this section

The Google Knowledge Graph has a history of giving biased information. Some notable incidents include:

  • Recognizing the Kannada language as the "ugliest language in India" (2021)
  • This list is incomplete.

It is literally just Wikipedia

Click/tap here to expand/collapse this section

Most of the time, the results for the Google Knowledge Graph are just the summary section of the Wikipedia article on the search subject. To make this worse, Wikipedia isn't even cited as the source, so most people who use this feature have no idea that most of their knowledge is just Wikipedia. This in turn has hurt Wikipedia, as it caused a significant drop in readership and traffic. Most of the time, when someone says Source: Google what they should have said was Source: Wikipedia


File info

Click/tap here to expand/collapse this section

File type: Markdown (*.md *.mkd *.mdown *.markdown)

File version: 1 (2022, Friday, December 23rd at 3:58 pm PST)

Line count (including blank lines and compiler line): 103

Current article language: English (EN_USA) / Markdown (CommonMark) / HTML5 (HyperText Markup Language 5.3)

Encoding: UTF-8 (Emoji 12.0 or higher recommended)

All times are UTC-7 (PDT/Pacific Time) (Please also account for DST (Daylight Savings Time) for older/newer entries up until it is abolished/no longer followed)

Note that on 2022, Sunday, March 13th at 2:00 am PST, the time jumped ahead 1 hour to 3:00 am.

You may need special rendering support for the <details> HTML tag being used in this document


File history

Click/tap here to expand/collapse the file history section for this project

Version 1 (2022, Friday, December 23rd at 3:58 pm PST)

This version was made by: @seanpm2001

Changes:

  • Started the file
  • Added the title section
  • Added the Lack of source attribution section
  • Added the Bias section
  • Added the It is literally just Wikipedia section
  • Added the file info section
    • Added the version number
    • Added the version date
    • Added the line count
  • Added the file history section
    • Added an entry for version 1
  • No other changes in version 1