Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

🏷️ Mark presence.subscribe() options as internal #630

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2023
Merged

🏷️ Mark presence.subscribe() options as internal #630

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2023

Conversation

alecgibson
Copy link
Collaborator

Add a prefix to the force option to mark it as internal, so we can remove it later if needed.

@alecgibson
🏷️ Mark presence.subscribe() options as internal
cc4cccb 
Add a prefix to the `force` option to mark it as internal, so we can
remove it later if needed.
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 97.509%. remained the same when pulling cc4cccb on internalise-force-subscribe into e7e77ba on master.

@alecgibson alecgibson merged commit 6831fa8 into master Oct 10, 2023
8 checks passed
@alecgibson alecgibson deleted the internalise-force-subscribe branch October 10, 2023 17:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ericyhwang ericyhwang ericyhwang approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@alecgibson @coveralls @ericyhwang