change: compute_score sig

[shenxiangzhuang]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Updated the compute_score function to improve performance by optimizing how data is passed and handled.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This update focuses on optimizing the parameter passing in Rust functions by shifting from direct value handling to using references. This change primarily affects the compute_score function across multiple modules, enhancing memory efficiency and potentially improving performance by avoiding unnecessary data copies.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
scoring.rs, bleu.rs, lib.rs	Updated compute_score function to use references instead of direct values for parameters.

🐇✨
In the land of code, where the bits align,
A rabbit hopped through the script divine.
Refs over values, it chanted with glee,
Memory's friend, as swift as can be!
🌟📜🚀

---

Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61e45e7 and c48aaec.

Files selected for processing (3)

• CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
• src/bleu.rs (2 hunks)
• src/lib.rs (1 hunks)

Additional Context Used

LanguageTool (4)

CHANGELOG.md (4)

Near line 5: Only proper nouns start with an uppercase character (there are exceptions for headlines).
Context: ... in this file. The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com...

---

Near line 11: Possible missing preposition found.
Context: ....html). ## [Unreleased] ### Changed - Implement ngram counts with a better way (#33) - ...

---

Near line 11: Possible spelling mistake found.
Context: ...# [Unreleased] ### Changed - Implement ngram counts with a better way (#33) - Rust `...

---

Near line 20: Possible spelling mistake found.
Context: ...b", "rlib"] ## [0.1.0] - 2024-04-23 - BLEU score calculation withTokenizer13a` a...

GitHub Check Runs (1)

codecov/patch failure (1)

src/lib.rs: [warning] 71-71: src/lib.rs#L71
Added line #L71 was not covered by tests

Additional comments not posted (2)

CHANGELOG.md (1)

12-12: Ensure the entry for the compute_score function change is clear and detailed.

It's important to specify which parameters were changed to references for clarity.

src/bleu.rs (1)

20-21: The change to pass references instead of values is correctly implemented.

This modification aligns with Rust's efficient memory management practices.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 75.00000% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 80.28%. Comparing base (61e45e7) to head (c48aaec).

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/lib.rs	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #34   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.28%   80.28%           
=======================================
  Files           4        4           
  Lines         279      279           
=======================================
  Hits          224      224           
  Misses         55       55           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

[coderabbitai]

Add unit tests for the modified compute function.

Would you like me to help by writing some unit tests or should I open a GitHub issue to track this task?